Measuring the Emergence of Consent Management on the Web

M. Hils, Daniel W. Woods, Rainer Böhme
{"title":"Measuring the Emergence of Consent Management on the Web","authors":"M. Hils, Daniel W. Woods, Rainer Böhme","doi":"10.1145/3419394.3423647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have pushed internet firms processing personal data to obtain user consent. Uncertainty around sanctions for non-compliance led many websites to embed a Consent Management Provider (CMP), which collects users' consent and shares it with third-party vendors and other websites. Our paper maps the formation of this ecosystem using longitudinal measurements. Primary and secondary data sources are used to measure each actor within the ecosystem. Using 161 million browser crawls, we estimate that CMP adoption doubled from June 2018 to June 2019 and then doubled again until June 2020. Sampling 4.2 million unique domains, we observe that CMP adoption is most prevalent among moderately popular websites (Tranco top 50-10k) but a long tail exists. Using APIs from the ad-tech industry, we quantify the purposes and lawful bases used to justify processing personal data. A controlled experiment on a public website provides novel insights into how the time-to-complete of two leading CMPs' consent dialogues varies with the preferences expressed, showing how privacy aware users incur a significant time cost.","PeriodicalId":255324,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Privacy laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have pushed internet firms processing personal data to obtain user consent. Uncertainty around sanctions for non-compliance led many websites to embed a Consent Management Provider (CMP), which collects users' consent and shares it with third-party vendors and other websites. Our paper maps the formation of this ecosystem using longitudinal measurements. Primary and secondary data sources are used to measure each actor within the ecosystem. Using 161 million browser crawls, we estimate that CMP adoption doubled from June 2018 to June 2019 and then doubled again until June 2020. Sampling 4.2 million unique domains, we observe that CMP adoption is most prevalent among moderately popular websites (Tranco top 50-10k) but a long tail exists. Using APIs from the ad-tech industry, we quantify the purposes and lawful bases used to justify processing personal data. A controlled experiment on a public website provides novel insights into how the time-to-complete of two leading CMPs' consent dialogues varies with the preferences expressed, showing how privacy aware users incur a significant time cost.
衡量同意管理在网络上的出现
《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)和《加州消费者隐私法》(CCPA)等隐私法促使互联网公司在处理个人数据时获得用户同意。不确定性导致许多网站嵌入了一个同意管理提供商(CMP),它收集用户的同意,并与第三方供应商和其他网站共享。我们的论文利用纵向测量绘制了这个生态系统的形成图。主要和次要数据源用于测量生态系统中的每个参与者。使用1.61亿次浏览器抓取,我们估计从2018年6月到2019年6月,CMP的采用率翻了一番,然后再翻一番,直到2020年6月。通过对420万个独立域名进行抽样,我们观察到CMP的采用在中等受欢迎的网站(Tranco排名前50-10万)中最为普遍,但存在长尾。使用来自广告技术行业的api,我们量化了处理个人数据的目的和合法依据。在一个公共网站上进行的一项对照实验提供了新的见解,揭示了两个领先的cmp同意对话的完成时间如何随着所表达的偏好而变化,显示了隐私意识的用户如何产生重大的时间成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信