Linear System Identification of Longitudinal Vehicle Dynamics Versus Nonlinear Physical Modelling

Sebastian S. James, S. Anderson
{"title":"Linear System Identification of Longitudinal Vehicle Dynamics Versus Nonlinear Physical Modelling","authors":"Sebastian S. James, S. Anderson","doi":"10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical modelling of vehicle dynamics is essential for the development of autonomous cars. Many of the vehicle models that are used for control design in cars are based on nonlinear physical models. However, it is not clear, especially for the case of longitudinal dynamics, whether such nonlinear models are necessary or simpler models can be used. In this paper, we identify a linear data-driven model of longitudinal vehicle dynamics and compare it to a nonlinear physically derived model. The linear model was identified in continuous-time state-space form using a prediction error method. The identification data were obtained from a Lancia Delta car, over 53 km of normal driving on public roads. The selected linear model was first order with requested torque, brake and road gradient as inputs and car velocity as output. The key results were that 1. the linear model was accurate, with a variance accounted for (VAF) metric of VAF=96.5%, and 2. the identified linear model was also superior in accuracy to the nonlinear physical model, VAF=77.4%. The implication of these results, therefore, is that for longitudinal dynamics, in normal driving conditions, a first order linear model is sufficient to describe the vehicle dynamics. This is advantageous for control design, state estimation and real-time implementation, e.g. in predictive control.","PeriodicalId":266112,"journal":{"name":"2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Mathematical modelling of vehicle dynamics is essential for the development of autonomous cars. Many of the vehicle models that are used for control design in cars are based on nonlinear physical models. However, it is not clear, especially for the case of longitudinal dynamics, whether such nonlinear models are necessary or simpler models can be used. In this paper, we identify a linear data-driven model of longitudinal vehicle dynamics and compare it to a nonlinear physically derived model. The linear model was identified in continuous-time state-space form using a prediction error method. The identification data were obtained from a Lancia Delta car, over 53 km of normal driving on public roads. The selected linear model was first order with requested torque, brake and road gradient as inputs and car velocity as output. The key results were that 1. the linear model was accurate, with a variance accounted for (VAF) metric of VAF=96.5%, and 2. the identified linear model was also superior in accuracy to the nonlinear physical model, VAF=77.4%. The implication of these results, therefore, is that for longitudinal dynamics, in normal driving conditions, a first order linear model is sufficient to describe the vehicle dynamics. This is advantageous for control design, state estimation and real-time implementation, e.g. in predictive control.
车辆纵向动力学线性系统辨识与非线性物理建模
车辆动力学的数学建模对于自动驾驶汽车的发展至关重要。许多用于汽车控制设计的车辆模型都是基于非线性物理模型的。然而,目前还不清楚,特别是对于纵向动力学的情况,是否需要这样的非线性模型,或者可以使用更简单的模型。在本文中,我们确定了一个线性数据驱动的纵向车辆动力学模型,并将其与非线性物理推导模型进行了比较。采用预测误差法对连续时间状态空间形式的线性模型进行识别。识别数据来自一辆蓝旗亚德尔塔汽车,在公共道路上正常行驶了53公里。所选择的线性模型是一阶的,以要求的扭矩、制动和道路坡度为输入,以车速为输出。关键的结果是1。线性模型准确,方差占(VAF)指标VAF=96.5%;所识别的线性模型也优于非线性物理模型,VAF=77.4%。因此,这些结果的含义是,对于纵向动力学,在正常驾驶条件下,一阶线性模型足以描述车辆动力学。这有利于控制设计、状态估计和实时实现,例如在预测控制中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信