Antegrade extraperitoneoscopic revascularization of the penis in the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.

A. Mustafaev, P. Kyzlasov, G. Abuev, E. V. Volokitin
{"title":"Antegrade extraperitoneoscopic revascularization of the penis in the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.","authors":"A. Mustafaev, P. Kyzlasov, G. Abuev, E. V. Volokitin","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-91-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a multifaceted and widely prevalent problem in modern medicine. The problem of erectile dysfunction has not only medical but also social significance – the presence of erectile dysfunction in men has a deleterious effect on their quality of life. One of the few pathophysiologically substantiated surgical methods of treatment for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is penile revascularization. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of antegrade extraperitoneoscopic penile revascularization in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, to develop an algorithm for selecting patients with vasculogenic ED suitable for penile revascularization surgery. Materials and methods. From 2015 to 2022, 65 penile revascularizations were performed in patients with vasculogenic ED. All patients were divided into 2 groups. In the main group, antegrade extraperitoneoscopic penile revascularization was performed in 34 patients, while in the control group, penile revascularization was performed in 31 patients according to the Virag-Kovalev method. To assess the results of the treatment, we used the scales and questionnaires IIEF-5, QoL, and the evaluation of penile rigidity on the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) scale. We also compared the duration of surgery and length of hospital stay. Results. The duration of surgery in the main group was significantly shorter (p <0.01) than in the control group. Additionally, the length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (p <0.05) in the main group. When comparing patients, there was a significant statistical difference in IIEF-5, EHS, and QoL scores. Conclusions. Penile revascularization, particularly the antegrade revascularization method, is an effective method for treating ED. The proposed methodology, based on the shortcomings of previous methods, is the most effective and least invasive of all the presented options. The success of penile revascularization surgery directly depends on careful patient selection and surgeon experience.","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"106 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-91-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a multifaceted and widely prevalent problem in modern medicine. The problem of erectile dysfunction has not only medical but also social significance – the presence of erectile dysfunction in men has a deleterious effect on their quality of life. One of the few pathophysiologically substantiated surgical methods of treatment for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is penile revascularization. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of antegrade extraperitoneoscopic penile revascularization in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, to develop an algorithm for selecting patients with vasculogenic ED suitable for penile revascularization surgery. Materials and methods. From 2015 to 2022, 65 penile revascularizations were performed in patients with vasculogenic ED. All patients were divided into 2 groups. In the main group, antegrade extraperitoneoscopic penile revascularization was performed in 34 patients, while in the control group, penile revascularization was performed in 31 patients according to the Virag-Kovalev method. To assess the results of the treatment, we used the scales and questionnaires IIEF-5, QoL, and the evaluation of penile rigidity on the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) scale. We also compared the duration of surgery and length of hospital stay. Results. The duration of surgery in the main group was significantly shorter (p <0.01) than in the control group. Additionally, the length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (p <0.05) in the main group. When comparing patients, there was a significant statistical difference in IIEF-5, EHS, and QoL scores. Conclusions. Penile revascularization, particularly the antegrade revascularization method, is an effective method for treating ED. The proposed methodology, based on the shortcomings of previous methods, is the most effective and least invasive of all the presented options. The success of penile revascularization surgery directly depends on careful patient selection and surgeon experience.
顺行腹腔外镜下阴茎血运重建术治疗血管源性勃起功能障碍。
介绍。勃起功能障碍(ED)是现代医学中一个多方面且普遍存在的问题。勃起功能障碍的问题不仅具有医学意义,而且具有社会意义——男性勃起功能障碍的存在对他们的生活质量有有害的影响。其中为数不多的病理生理学证实的手术方法治疗血管源性勃起功能障碍是阴茎血运重建术。目标。评价顺行腹腔外镜下阴茎血运重建术治疗血管源性勃起功能障碍患者的效果,研究适合血管源性ED患者进行阴茎血运重建术的选择算法。材料和方法。2015 - 2022年,对血管性ED患者行阴茎血运重建术65例。所有患者分为2组。主组34例患者行顺行腹腔外镜下阴茎血运重建术,对照组31例患者行Virag-Kovalev法阴茎血运重建术。为了评估治疗效果,我们使用了IIEF-5量表和问卷,QoL和阴茎硬度在勃起硬度评分(EHS)量表上的评估。我们还比较了手术时间和住院时间。结果。主组手术时间明显短于对照组(p <0.01)。此外,主组术后住院时间明显缩短(p <0.05)。两组患者比较,IIEF-5、EHS、QoL评分差异有统计学意义。结论。阴茎血运重建术,尤其是顺行血运重建术,是治疗ED的一种有效方法。基于以往方法的缺点,本文提出的方法是所有提出的方法中最有效、侵入性最小的。阴茎血运重建术的成功与否直接取决于患者的选择和外科医生的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信