Consanguinity: A Form of Social Capital Among the Muslims of Char Areas in Barpeta District, Assam

G. Begum
{"title":"Consanguinity: A Form of Social Capital Among the Muslims of Char Areas in Barpeta District, Assam","authors":"G. Begum","doi":"10.1177/2277436X211011289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information on the dynamics of consanguinity is always important for public health strategy. It provides a direct roadmap for healthcare providers and health policymakers to make people aware of the consequences of consanguinity. The present study aims to investigate the attitude of the Muslim people practising consanguinity in the char (river island) areas of Barpeta district in Assam. It intends to seek a cultural explanation behind the practice of consanguinity. The study was conducted cross-sectionally among the Muslims living in different villages of the temporary, semi-permanent and permanent river islands of Barpeta district in Assam. A total of 556 married couples were included in the study. Of these, 103 couples are consanguineous and the rest 453 are non-consanguineous. To study the prevalence of congenital disorders, a sample of 153 males and 121 female inbred children of the consanguineous couples and 701 male and 571 female children of the non-consanguineous parents have been included in the study. The prevalence of consanguineous marriage in the chars was found to be 18.53% and the average coefficient of inbreeding was 0.05996796. Of the consanguineous marriages, the most favoured type was between the first cousins (63.11%), followed by half first-cousin marriages (12.62%). Altogether 14.60% of inbred were found to have some type of congenital disorder against 0.31% non-inbred. In the chars of Barpeta, it is not only ignorance but poor economic condition is also a reason behind the practise of consanguinity. Consanguineous marriage provides means of escaping the expenditure incurred in dowry or bridewealth payment. With seasonal floods, river erodes their village and crops completely every year. Family remains the sole source of stability and security. Consanguineous marriage therefore forms a sort of social capital as they are a source of secured and stable married life in the most hostile ecological settings where these people are living. Social security is of utmost priority behind these marriages in the char.","PeriodicalId":198822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2277436X211011289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information on the dynamics of consanguinity is always important for public health strategy. It provides a direct roadmap for healthcare providers and health policymakers to make people aware of the consequences of consanguinity. The present study aims to investigate the attitude of the Muslim people practising consanguinity in the char (river island) areas of Barpeta district in Assam. It intends to seek a cultural explanation behind the practice of consanguinity. The study was conducted cross-sectionally among the Muslims living in different villages of the temporary, semi-permanent and permanent river islands of Barpeta district in Assam. A total of 556 married couples were included in the study. Of these, 103 couples are consanguineous and the rest 453 are non-consanguineous. To study the prevalence of congenital disorders, a sample of 153 males and 121 female inbred children of the consanguineous couples and 701 male and 571 female children of the non-consanguineous parents have been included in the study. The prevalence of consanguineous marriage in the chars was found to be 18.53% and the average coefficient of inbreeding was 0.05996796. Of the consanguineous marriages, the most favoured type was between the first cousins (63.11%), followed by half first-cousin marriages (12.62%). Altogether 14.60% of inbred were found to have some type of congenital disorder against 0.31% non-inbred. In the chars of Barpeta, it is not only ignorance but poor economic condition is also a reason behind the practise of consanguinity. Consanguineous marriage provides means of escaping the expenditure incurred in dowry or bridewealth payment. With seasonal floods, river erodes their village and crops completely every year. Family remains the sole source of stability and security. Consanguineous marriage therefore forms a sort of social capital as they are a source of secured and stable married life in the most hostile ecological settings where these people are living. Social security is of utmost priority behind these marriages in the char.
血缘关系:阿萨姆邦巴佩塔区查尔地区穆斯林社会资本的一种形式
关于亲属关系动态的信息对公共卫生战略总是很重要的。它为卫生保健提供者和卫生政策制定者提供了一个直接的路线图,使人们意识到血缘关系的后果。本研究的目的是调查阿萨姆邦Barpeta区char(河岛)地区实行血缘关系的穆斯林的态度。它试图在血缘关系的实践背后寻找一种文化解释。这项研究是在阿萨姆邦巴佩塔区临时、半永久和永久河岛不同村庄的穆斯林中进行的。共有556对已婚夫妇参与了这项研究。其中,103对是近亲,其余453对是非近亲。为了研究先天性疾病的患病率,本研究选取了153名男性近亲子女和121名女性近亲子女,以及701名男性非近亲子女和571名女性非近亲子女。调查结果显示,该区近亲通婚率为18.53%,平均近交系数为0.05996796。在近亲婚姻中,最受欢迎的类型是近亲婚姻(63.11%),其次是半近亲婚姻(12.62%)。共有14.60%的近亲发现有某种类型的先天性疾病,而非近亲的比例为0.31%。在《巴佩塔》中,除了无知之外,糟糕的经济状况也是近亲行为背后的一个原因。近亲婚姻提供了一种逃避聘礼或嫁妆支付的手段。由于季节性的洪水,河流每年都会完全侵蚀他们的村庄和庄稼。家庭仍然是稳定和安全的唯一来源。因此,近亲婚姻形成了一种社会资本,因为在这些人生活的最恶劣的生态环境中,它们是安全稳定的婚姻生活的来源。社会保障是这些婚姻背后最重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信