Rule 3 of the Draft Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2020: An important milestone

Jehosh Paul
{"title":"Rule 3 of the Draft Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2020: An important milestone","authors":"Jehosh Paul","doi":"10.55763/ippr.2023.04.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWhen Rule 3 of the Draft Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2020 (hereafter referred to as ‘Draft Rules’) was notified, the shortcomings of Rule 3(1) in the Draft were highlighted by the discussion paper published by the International Labour Organisation and the recommendations made by Oxfam. This paper argues that despite its shortcomings, Rule 3(1) in the Draft Rules is still an important milestone for the progressive realisation of workers’ welfare in India, because it is the first time that the Union Government has shown normative commitment towards ratifying the recommendations of the 15th Indian Labour Conference, 1957. The benefit of calculating the minimum wage as per Rule 3(1) of the Draft Rules, which is in tune with the 15th Indian Labour Conference recommendations, would be that it will ensure that the minimum wages will be set at a quantum higher than usually set by the Committees and Wage Boards appointed by the Union Governments throughout history. Therefore, while it is necessary that the civil society organisations eventually push for a better version of Rule 3(1) in the Draft Rules, it is equally important that they act as watchdogs to ensure full-fledged ratification and implementation of the 15th ILC norms in Rule 3(1) in the Draft Code Rules in the first place. \n","PeriodicalId":173340,"journal":{"name":"Indian Public Policy Review","volume":"17 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Public Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55763/ippr.2023.04.03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Rule 3 of the Draft Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2020 (hereafter referred to as ‘Draft Rules’) was notified, the shortcomings of Rule 3(1) in the Draft were highlighted by the discussion paper published by the International Labour Organisation and the recommendations made by Oxfam. This paper argues that despite its shortcomings, Rule 3(1) in the Draft Rules is still an important milestone for the progressive realisation of workers’ welfare in India, because it is the first time that the Union Government has shown normative commitment towards ratifying the recommendations of the 15th Indian Labour Conference, 1957. The benefit of calculating the minimum wage as per Rule 3(1) of the Draft Rules, which is in tune with the 15th Indian Labour Conference recommendations, would be that it will ensure that the minimum wages will be set at a quantum higher than usually set by the Committees and Wage Boards appointed by the Union Governments throughout history. Therefore, while it is necessary that the civil society organisations eventually push for a better version of Rule 3(1) in the Draft Rules, it is equally important that they act as watchdogs to ensure full-fledged ratification and implementation of the 15th ILC norms in Rule 3(1) in the Draft Code Rules in the first place.
2020年《工资(中央)条例草案》第3条:重要里程碑
在公布《2020年工资守则(中央)规则草拟本》(下称“规则草拟本”)第3条时,国际劳工组织发表的讨论文件及乐施会的建议突显了该草拟本第3(1)条的不足之处。本文认为,尽管存在缺陷,规则草案中的规则3(1)仍然是印度逐步实现工人福利的重要里程碑,因为这是联邦政府第一次对批准第15届印度劳工大会(1957年)的建议做出规范性承诺。根据规则草案第3(1)条计算最低工资的好处是,这与第15届印度劳工大会的建议是一致的,它将确保最低工资的设定高于历史上由联盟政府任命的委员会和工资委员会通常设定的水平。因此,虽然民间社会组织有必要最终推动规则草案中规则3(1)的更好版本,但同样重要的是,他们作为监督机构,首先确保守则草案规则3(1)中第15条国际贸易法委员会规范的全面批准和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信