{"title":"SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCI ES OF BORDERGUARD CADETS","authors":"Halyna Topolnytska","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-185-8/58-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The fundamental theoretical basis for interdisciplinary research in the problems of personality development and formation, to which the culture of interpersonal relations belongs, is the provision on the human social essence. The personality crystallizes in own psychological structure of social relations, and at the same time personality. becomes their object and subject. The category of «relationship» becomes the «common territory, a subject that belongs at the same time to both psychology and ethics.» S. Rubinstein noted that relationships are «the core of real-life psychology», «the realm of the» intersection «of psychology with ethics» 1 (Rubinshtein, 1989). Using the category of relations as the basic one, one should pay attention to the concept of relations V. Myasishchev, who characterized the study of relations as «... an important approach in psychology, which combines the objective with the subjective, external with internal» 2 (Miasishchev, 1995a). From this point of view, the relationship as a subject-subject relationship is not only a socio-psychological but also a cultural category, that is, in the phenomenon of relations, the unity of psychological and social is realized. The concept of relations of V. Myasishchev foresees at least four points when analyzing the phenomenon of “relationship” itself. Firstly, this is the need for another, in which V. Myasishchev understood «... the cognitive tendency to master another person» 3 (Miasishchev, 1995b). This is a distinction between two basic needs: the need for communication and the need for co-operation. Secondly, it is an interest in the other as an «active emotional-cognitive attitude to another person.» The scientist distinguished two types of interest: interest in the personal sphere, that is, experiences, feelings and unique originality and interest in the","PeriodicalId":415020,"journal":{"name":"AGE ASPECTS OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGE ASPECTS OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-185-8/58-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The fundamental theoretical basis for interdisciplinary research in the problems of personality development and formation, to which the culture of interpersonal relations belongs, is the provision on the human social essence. The personality crystallizes in own psychological structure of social relations, and at the same time personality. becomes their object and subject. The category of «relationship» becomes the «common territory, a subject that belongs at the same time to both psychology and ethics.» S. Rubinstein noted that relationships are «the core of real-life psychology», «the realm of the» intersection «of psychology with ethics» 1 (Rubinshtein, 1989). Using the category of relations as the basic one, one should pay attention to the concept of relations V. Myasishchev, who characterized the study of relations as «... an important approach in psychology, which combines the objective with the subjective, external with internal» 2 (Miasishchev, 1995a). From this point of view, the relationship as a subject-subject relationship is not only a socio-psychological but also a cultural category, that is, in the phenomenon of relations, the unity of psychological and social is realized. The concept of relations of V. Myasishchev foresees at least four points when analyzing the phenomenon of “relationship” itself. Firstly, this is the need for another, in which V. Myasishchev understood «... the cognitive tendency to master another person» 3 (Miasishchev, 1995b). This is a distinction between two basic needs: the need for communication and the need for co-operation. Secondly, it is an interest in the other as an «active emotional-cognitive attitude to another person.» The scientist distinguished two types of interest: interest in the personal sphere, that is, experiences, feelings and unique originality and interest in the