Cross-Border Commercial Disputes: Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments After Brexit

M. Kulińska
{"title":"Cross-Border Commercial Disputes: Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments After Brexit","authors":"M. Kulińska","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brexit raises a whole range of legal issues in multiple areas. The consequences on the EU framework for jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments are of particular interest for private parties involved in cross-border commercial agreements. This paper explores the legal basis for the jurisdiction of courts and the enforcement and recognition of judgments between the UK and EU-27 courts after Brexit. In addition, it broadly contrasts the main differences of the proposed solutions compared to the EU system. The paper argues that international conventions can provide answers to some of the questions as they set out rules for the jurisdiction, enforcement and recognition of judgments. However, there are factors that can have an impact on possible legal outcomes, such as the framework of the future deal between the UK and the EU-27, the moment of the commencement of proceedings by the parties in the transition period, or the fact that the parties did not opt for exclusive jurisdiction in their agreements. The Withdrawal Agreement provides for some clarity on which EU law provisions apply during the transition period. In addition, the EC Notices and the UK Brexit legislation provide for guidelines as to the rules applicable in and immediately after the transition period. Nevertheless, as the paper analyses, there is still a need for further clarification. Therefore, other methods of dispute resolution proposed in the article such as moving to arbitration instead of English court jurisdiction could provide legal certainty for private parties. \nKeywords: EU law, Brexit, art 50, withdrawal agreement, recognition and enforcement of judgements, EU civil justice and judicial cooperation, cross-border commercial disputes. \n  \n \nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \n  \nSuggested citation: M Kulinska, ‘Cross-Border Commercial Disputes: Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments After Brexit’ (2020) 16 CYELP 279.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Brexit raises a whole range of legal issues in multiple areas. The consequences on the EU framework for jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments are of particular interest for private parties involved in cross-border commercial agreements. This paper explores the legal basis for the jurisdiction of courts and the enforcement and recognition of judgments between the UK and EU-27 courts after Brexit. In addition, it broadly contrasts the main differences of the proposed solutions compared to the EU system. The paper argues that international conventions can provide answers to some of the questions as they set out rules for the jurisdiction, enforcement and recognition of judgments. However, there are factors that can have an impact on possible legal outcomes, such as the framework of the future deal between the UK and the EU-27, the moment of the commencement of proceedings by the parties in the transition period, or the fact that the parties did not opt for exclusive jurisdiction in their agreements. The Withdrawal Agreement provides for some clarity on which EU law provisions apply during the transition period. In addition, the EC Notices and the UK Brexit legislation provide for guidelines as to the rules applicable in and immediately after the transition period. Nevertheless, as the paper analyses, there is still a need for further clarification. Therefore, other methods of dispute resolution proposed in the article such as moving to arbitration instead of English court jurisdiction could provide legal certainty for private parties. Keywords: EU law, Brexit, art 50, withdrawal agreement, recognition and enforcement of judgements, EU civil justice and judicial cooperation, cross-border commercial disputes.   This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.   Suggested citation: M Kulinska, ‘Cross-Border Commercial Disputes: Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments After Brexit’ (2020) 16 CYELP 279.
跨境商事纠纷:英国脱欧后判决的管辖权、承认与执行
英国脱欧在多个领域引发了一系列法律问题。涉及跨境商业协议的私人当事方对欧盟管辖权、判决的承认和执行框架的影响特别感兴趣。本文探讨了英国脱欧后法院管辖权的法律依据,以及英国与欧盟27国法院之间判决的执行与承认。此外,本文还广泛对比了拟议解决方案与欧盟体系的主要差异。本文认为,国际公约可以为某些问题提供答案,因为它们为判决的管辖权、执行和承认规定了规则。然而,有一些因素可能会对可能的法律结果产生影响,例如英国与欧盟27国之间未来协议的框架,过渡期各方启动诉讼程序的时刻,或者各方在其协议中没有选择专属管辖权的事实。《脱欧协议》明确规定了哪些欧盟法律条款在过渡期适用。此外,欧共体通知和英国脱欧立法提供了在过渡期及其后立即适用的规则的指导方针。然而,正如本文所分析的那样,仍有必要进一步澄清。因此,文章中提出的其他争议解决方法,如将英国法院管辖权转移到仲裁,可以为私人当事人提供法律确定性。关键词:欧盟法,英国脱欧,第50条,退出协议,判决的承认与执行,欧盟民事司法与司法合作,跨境商事纠纷本作品在知识共享署名-非商业-无衍生品4.0国际许可下获得许可。建议引用:M Kulinska,“跨境商业纠纷:英国脱欧后判决的管辖权、承认和执行”(2020)16 CYELP 279。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信