The First Draft

M. McConville, L. Marsh
{"title":"The First Draft","authors":"M. McConville, L. Marsh","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198822103.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of policing scandals at all ranks within the police (discussed in Chapter 4) and the gradual realization that investigative practices, particularly by the Criminal Investigations Department, had developed in ways which showed disrespect for individual rights and caused doubts as to the reliability of police evidence with regard to ‘confessions’, made reconsideration of the Judges’ Rules unavoidable. This chapter describes the initial phase in which the judges themselves sought to draw up new Rules against the background of the changing climate of police–citizen relations that the post-war period had inaugurated and the fate that their proposals met. After deliberating for sixteen months, and amid rising public concern over police practices, in 1962 the judges produced a set of proposals designed to meet ‘the public interest’ in regulating the police. These far-sighted proposals were in key respects a mirror of the regime established twenty-five years later by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). This chapter shows how the executive summarily killed off these proposals, prioritizing instead what it saw as ‘the interests of the police’.","PeriodicalId":140616,"journal":{"name":"The Myth of Judicial Independence","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Myth of Judicial Independence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198822103.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of policing scandals at all ranks within the police (discussed in Chapter 4) and the gradual realization that investigative practices, particularly by the Criminal Investigations Department, had developed in ways which showed disrespect for individual rights and caused doubts as to the reliability of police evidence with regard to ‘confessions’, made reconsideration of the Judges’ Rules unavoidable. This chapter describes the initial phase in which the judges themselves sought to draw up new Rules against the background of the changing climate of police–citizen relations that the post-war period had inaugurated and the fate that their proposals met. After deliberating for sixteen months, and amid rising public concern over police practices, in 1962 the judges produced a set of proposals designed to meet ‘the public interest’ in regulating the police. These far-sighted proposals were in key respects a mirror of the regime established twenty-five years later by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). This chapter shows how the executive summarily killed off these proposals, prioritizing instead what it saw as ‘the interests of the police’.
初稿
警察各阶层的各种警务丑闻(在第4章中讨论),以及逐渐认识到调查做法,特别是刑事调查部的调查做法,已经发展到不尊重个人权利的地步,并使人们对警方关于“供词”的证据的可靠性产生怀疑,因此不可避免地要重新考虑《法官规则》。本章描述了法官自己在战后时期开始的警察-公民关系的变化气候和他们的建议所遇到的命运的背景下试图起草新规则的最初阶段。经过16个月的审议,在公众对警察行为日益关注的情况下,法官们在1962年提出了一系列建议,旨在满足监管警察的“公众利益”。这些有远见的建议在关键方面反映了25年后《1984年警察和刑事证物法》(PACE)所建立的制度。本章展示了行政部门如何草率地扼杀了这些提议,优先考虑它所认为的“警察的利益”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信