Iterative Minimum Viable Product Approach to Implementing AI, RPA, and BI Solutions

Rishabh Srivastava
{"title":"Iterative Minimum Viable Product Approach to Implementing AI, RPA, and BI Solutions","authors":"Rishabh Srivastava","doi":"10.47670/wuwijar202151rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breakthrough technologies can be considered as exponentially disruptive to organizations across industries within the last few decades of the 21st century, as they have significantly altered the way their business units or customers operate. Artificial Intelligence related cognitive technologies are some of the latest disruptive solutions currently being adopted by organizations. Organizational leaders may feel both the pressure and excitement of adopting such nascent technology quickly and at scale. However, due to organizational knowledge gaps of nascent solutions, transformative large-scale initiatives have a higher risk of negative impact on failure to implement. On the other hand, an iterative approach allows for the implementation to occur in smaller amounts and leaves room for incorporating feedback and lessons learned in future iterations, thus mitigating the risks involved with the undertaking. This article breaks down the nascent field of advanced cognitive technologies into three main categories based on their business use cases: process automation, cognitive insights, and cognitive engagement. It then explores implementing this technology in each of its three categories through the lens of a popular iterative product lifecycle management approach (i.e., the Minimum Viable Product) to reduce the risk of failure or other negative impacts on an organization adopting cognitive solutions.","PeriodicalId":135801,"journal":{"name":"Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47670/wuwijar202151rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Breakthrough technologies can be considered as exponentially disruptive to organizations across industries within the last few decades of the 21st century, as they have significantly altered the way their business units or customers operate. Artificial Intelligence related cognitive technologies are some of the latest disruptive solutions currently being adopted by organizations. Organizational leaders may feel both the pressure and excitement of adopting such nascent technology quickly and at scale. However, due to organizational knowledge gaps of nascent solutions, transformative large-scale initiatives have a higher risk of negative impact on failure to implement. On the other hand, an iterative approach allows for the implementation to occur in smaller amounts and leaves room for incorporating feedback and lessons learned in future iterations, thus mitigating the risks involved with the undertaking. This article breaks down the nascent field of advanced cognitive technologies into three main categories based on their business use cases: process automation, cognitive insights, and cognitive engagement. It then explores implementing this technology in each of its three categories through the lens of a popular iterative product lifecycle management approach (i.e., the Minimum Viable Product) to reduce the risk of failure or other negative impacts on an organization adopting cognitive solutions.
实现AI, RPA和BI解决方案的迭代最小可行产品方法
在21世纪的最后几十年里,突破性技术对各行各业的组织都具有指数级的破坏性,因为它们极大地改变了业务部门或客户的运营方式。人工智能相关的认知技术是目前被组织采用的一些最新的颠覆性解决方案。组织领导者可能会感到压力和兴奋,以迅速和大规模采用这种新兴技术。然而,由于组织对新生解决方案的知识差距,变革性大规模计划对失败实施有更高的负面影响风险。另一方面,迭代方法允许以较小的数量实现,并为在未来的迭代中合并反馈和经验教训留下空间,从而减轻了与任务相关的风险。本文根据其业务用例将新兴的高级认知技术领域划分为三个主要类别:过程自动化、认知洞察和认知参与。然后,它通过流行的迭代产品生命周期管理方法(即,最小可行产品)的镜头,探索在其三个类别中的每个类别中实现该技术,以减少对采用认知解决方案的组织的失败风险或其他负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信