{"title":"Model of Integration of Policy Implementation in Poverty Alleviation in Enrekang Regency","authors":"S. Nur","doi":"10.30845/aijss.v8n4p9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to determine the output and outcome decisions on poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency, and organizational capacity on poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency. In addition to knowing the environmental capacity of poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency and to know the characteristics and poverty alleviation programs in Enrekang Regency. This research took place in Enrekang Regency with three districts namely Maiwa, Enrekang and Anggeraja Districts. The research approach is descriptive qualitative and prioritizing in-depth interviews through interview guidelines in addition to secondary data. Informants / respondents were taken as many as five people who were considered to know the background of this research. Analysis is carried out through descriptive qualitative. The theory used in studying the problem of poverty in Enrekang Regency Malcom L. Gogging et al. (1990), where the research results showed that output and outcome decisions, organizational capacity, environmental capacity, characteristics and poverty alleviation programs in Enrekang were not optimal. The implementation of poverty policy in Enekang Regency in terms of structural aspects with the formation of several institutions for reducing poverty from central, provincial to regency level policies. As a result, the implementation of poverty policies has not been able to mediate in making significant changes in education, health and employment. In the end, poverty alleviation as in the three cases of research locations namely Maiwa, Enrekang and Anggeraja Districts has not been able to reverse the facts as the BPS indicator standards. An integrated database of poverty alleviation programs is needed in Enrekang Regency and is more pro-job, pro-poor and pro-growth. Program synergy is needed between stakeholders, so that poverty alleviation programs are more targeted.","PeriodicalId":421989,"journal":{"name":"American International Journal of Social Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n4p9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to determine the output and outcome decisions on poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency, and organizational capacity on poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency. In addition to knowing the environmental capacity of poverty policy implementation in Enrekang Regency and to know the characteristics and poverty alleviation programs in Enrekang Regency. This research took place in Enrekang Regency with three districts namely Maiwa, Enrekang and Anggeraja Districts. The research approach is descriptive qualitative and prioritizing in-depth interviews through interview guidelines in addition to secondary data. Informants / respondents were taken as many as five people who were considered to know the background of this research. Analysis is carried out through descriptive qualitative. The theory used in studying the problem of poverty in Enrekang Regency Malcom L. Gogging et al. (1990), where the research results showed that output and outcome decisions, organizational capacity, environmental capacity, characteristics and poverty alleviation programs in Enrekang were not optimal. The implementation of poverty policy in Enekang Regency in terms of structural aspects with the formation of several institutions for reducing poverty from central, provincial to regency level policies. As a result, the implementation of poverty policies has not been able to mediate in making significant changes in education, health and employment. In the end, poverty alleviation as in the three cases of research locations namely Maiwa, Enrekang and Anggeraja Districts has not been able to reverse the facts as the BPS indicator standards. An integrated database of poverty alleviation programs is needed in Enrekang Regency and is more pro-job, pro-poor and pro-growth. Program synergy is needed between stakeholders, so that poverty alleviation programs are more targeted.
研究的目的是确定恩热康县实施贫困政策的产出和结果决策,以及恩热康县实施贫困政策的组织能力。了解恩仁康县扶贫政策实施的环境容量,了解恩仁康县的特点和扶贫项目。这项研究在恩热康县进行,有三个区,即Maiwa、恩热康和Anggeraja区。研究方法是描述性的,定性的,通过访谈指南和辅助数据优先进行深度访谈。举报人/受访者被选为多达五人,他们被认为知道这项研究的背景。分析是通过描述性定性进行的。研究恩热康贫困问题的理论是Malcom L. goging et al.(1990),其研究结果表明恩热康的产出和结果决策、组织能力、环境能力、特征和扶贫方案都不是最优的。贫困政策在恩内康县的实施在结构方面,形成了几个机构减少贫困从中央,省到县级的政策。因此,贫穷政策的执行未能促成教育、保健和就业方面的重大变化。最终,在麦瓦、恩热康和安杰拉贾三个研究地点的案例中,减贫并没有能够扭转作为BPS指标标准的事实。恩仁康县需要一个扶贫项目的综合数据库,它更有利于就业、贫困和增长。利益相关者之间需要项目协同,这样扶贫项目才更有针对性。