Appropriate FRAX® Intervention Threshold for Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Thailand

T. Amphansap, Chatdanai Phan-udom, P. Chotiyarnwong, Nitirat Stitkitti, Atiporn Therdyothin
{"title":"Appropriate FRAX® Intervention Threshold for Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Thailand","authors":"T. Amphansap, Chatdanai Phan-udom, P. Chotiyarnwong, Nitirat Stitkitti, Atiporn Therdyothin","doi":"10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) has been recommended and incorporated into osteoporotic guidelines worldwide to assess fracture risk and promptly diagnose osteoporosis when bone mineral density is unavailable. However, a country-specific intervention threshold for Thai patients remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify an appropriate cut-off point for the 10-year probability of hip fracture (HF), specifically in the Thai population.\nMethods: This retrospective cohort study included members of the Thai population aged 50-90 years, enrolled from January 2018 to January 2020. Analysis of data collected from online FRAX® tool questionnaires was conducted and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a new appropriate cut-off value as the intervention threshold.\nResults: A total of 1,311 (HF: 422 [32.2%], non-HF: 889 [67.8%]) participants were included. The FRAX® 10-year probability of fracture in patients with HF was significantly higher than in non-HF (5.8% ± 4% vs. 4.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas the probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was similar (11.0 ± 5.8% vs. 10.6 ± 6.2%, P = 0.27). The ROC curve revealed a new intervention threshold for the FRAX®-based 10-year risk for HF of 4.3% with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval: 0.632 (range: 0.602-0.663; P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 62.9% and 60.7%, respectively.\nConclusions: The intervention threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis treatment among the Thai population was 4.3%, which is higher than the cut-off point recommended in the Thai national guidelines.","PeriodicalId":333749,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) has been recommended and incorporated into osteoporotic guidelines worldwide to assess fracture risk and promptly diagnose osteoporosis when bone mineral density is unavailable. However, a country-specific intervention threshold for Thai patients remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify an appropriate cut-off point for the 10-year probability of hip fracture (HF), specifically in the Thai population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included members of the Thai population aged 50-90 years, enrolled from January 2018 to January 2020. Analysis of data collected from online FRAX® tool questionnaires was conducted and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a new appropriate cut-off value as the intervention threshold. Results: A total of 1,311 (HF: 422 [32.2%], non-HF: 889 [67.8%]) participants were included. The FRAX® 10-year probability of fracture in patients with HF was significantly higher than in non-HF (5.8% ± 4% vs. 4.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas the probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was similar (11.0 ± 5.8% vs. 10.6 ± 6.2%, P = 0.27). The ROC curve revealed a new intervention threshold for the FRAX®-based 10-year risk for HF of 4.3% with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval: 0.632 (range: 0.602-0.663; P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 62.9% and 60.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The intervention threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis treatment among the Thai population was 4.3%, which is higher than the cut-off point recommended in the Thai national guidelines.
泰国骨质疏松症药物治疗的适当FRAX®干预阈值
目的:骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)已被推荐并纳入世界范围内的骨质疏松指南,以评估骨折风险并在骨矿物质密度不可用时及时诊断骨质疏松症。然而,泰国患者的特定国家干预阈值仍然未知。因此,我们的目的是确定一个合适的10年髋部骨折(HF)概率的分界点,特别是在泰国人群中。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年1月至2020年1月登记的年龄在50-90岁之间的泰国人群。对在线FRAX®工具问卷收集的数据进行分析,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定一个新的适当的截止值作为干预阈值。结果:共纳入1311名参与者(HF: 422[32.2%],非HF: 889[67.8%])。HF患者FRAX®10年骨折概率显著高于非HF患者(分别为5.8%±4% vs. 4.7%±4.5%);P < 0.01),而严重骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的发生率相似(11.0±5.8% vs. 10.6±6.2%,P = 0.27)。ROC曲线显示,基于FRAX®的HF 10年风险的新干预阈值为4.3%,曲线下面积(AUC)最大(95%置信区间:0.632(范围:0.602-0.663;P < 0.001),敏感性为62.9%,特异性为60.7%。结论:泰国人群骨质疏松治疗的干预阈值临界值为4.3%,高于泰国国家指南推荐的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信