Family Conflict Management And Family Dispute Resolution on Marriage Breakdown and Divorce: Diverse Options

J. D. Payne
{"title":"Family Conflict Management And Family Dispute Resolution on Marriage Breakdown and Divorce: Diverse Options","authors":"J. D. Payne","doi":"10.7202/1027763ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family law is only one piece of the puzzle as separating and divorcing couples attempt to manage the conflict and deal with the practical problems arising on marriage breakdown. Divorce is a process, not an event. It is multi-faceted. The emotional dynamics of marriage breakdown may require a time consuming therapeutic response but parenting and economic arrangements must be resolved expeditiously. There is a tendency to assume that spouses who are locked in conflict will find themselves in court. In reality, fewer than four per cent of divorces proceed to trial. The costs of litigation are far too high, both financially and emotionally. Most disputes are resolved by negotiation, often with the assistance of lawyers. If negotiations are to bear fruit at a manageable cost to family members, hard bargaining that reflects \"a winner take all\" mentality must be avoided; principled negotiation, as espoused by Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton in Getting To Yes, can generate optimal results for all interested parties, including the children. Recent years have witnessed the growth of mediation, whereby a neutral third party assists family members in searching for consensus on matters in dispute. The mediator controls the process but the family members control the substantive outcome of their deliberations. Mediation is nothing more than structured negotiation where a third party facilitates resolution of the dispute. If a final settlement cannot be reached, one possible option is recourse to private arbitration in which a third party is given the authority to determine the respective rights and obligations of the spouses and their children. It is possible to combine the aforementioned processes for the purpose of reaching a complete settlement of matters in dispute. These processes are complementary to the judicial process and should be closely examined by all families faced by the cataclysmic disruption generated by a failed marriage.","PeriodicalId":370614,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Canadian Law - Public Law (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Canadian Law - Public Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1027763ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family law is only one piece of the puzzle as separating and divorcing couples attempt to manage the conflict and deal with the practical problems arising on marriage breakdown. Divorce is a process, not an event. It is multi-faceted. The emotional dynamics of marriage breakdown may require a time consuming therapeutic response but parenting and economic arrangements must be resolved expeditiously. There is a tendency to assume that spouses who are locked in conflict will find themselves in court. In reality, fewer than four per cent of divorces proceed to trial. The costs of litigation are far too high, both financially and emotionally. Most disputes are resolved by negotiation, often with the assistance of lawyers. If negotiations are to bear fruit at a manageable cost to family members, hard bargaining that reflects "a winner take all" mentality must be avoided; principled negotiation, as espoused by Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton in Getting To Yes, can generate optimal results for all interested parties, including the children. Recent years have witnessed the growth of mediation, whereby a neutral third party assists family members in searching for consensus on matters in dispute. The mediator controls the process but the family members control the substantive outcome of their deliberations. Mediation is nothing more than structured negotiation where a third party facilitates resolution of the dispute. If a final settlement cannot be reached, one possible option is recourse to private arbitration in which a third party is given the authority to determine the respective rights and obligations of the spouses and their children. It is possible to combine the aforementioned processes for the purpose of reaching a complete settlement of matters in dispute. These processes are complementary to the judicial process and should be closely examined by all families faced by the cataclysmic disruption generated by a failed marriage.
婚姻破裂与离婚的家庭冲突管理与家庭纠纷解决:多种选择
当分居和离婚的夫妇试图处理冲突和处理婚姻破裂所产生的实际问题时,家庭法只是难题的一部分。离婚是一个过程,而不是一个事件。它是多方面的。婚姻破裂的情感动力可能需要一个耗时的治疗反应,但育儿和经济安排必须尽快解决。有一种倾向认为,陷入冲突的配偶会上法庭。在现实中,只有不到4%的离婚案进入审判程序。无论是经济上还是情感上,诉讼的成本都太高了。大多数争议是通过谈判解决的,通常在律师的协助下。如果谈判要在家庭成员可控的代价下取得成果,就必须避免反映“赢家通吃”心态的艰苦谈判;罗杰·费舍尔、威廉·尤里和布鲁斯·巴顿在《同意》一书中所倡导的有原则的谈判,可以为包括孩子在内的所有利益相关方带来最佳结果。近年来,调解出现了增长,即由中立的第三方协助家庭成员就争议事项寻求共识。调解员控制着过程,但家庭成员控制着他们讨论的实质性结果。调解只不过是有组织的协商,由第三方协助解决争议。如果不能达成最后解决办法,一个可能的选择是求助于私人仲裁,由第三方有权确定配偶及其子女各自的权利和义务。可以将上述进程结合起来,以彻底解决争端事项。这些程序是对司法程序的补充,所有因婚姻失败而遭受灾难性破坏的家庭都应密切审查这些程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信