A Hybrid Deep-learning/Fingerprinting for Indoor Positioning Based on IEEE P802.11az

Nader G. Rihan, M. Abdelaziz, Samy S. Soliman
{"title":"A Hybrid Deep-learning/Fingerprinting for Indoor Positioning Based on IEEE P802.11az","authors":"Nader G. Rihan, M. Abdelaziz, Samy S. Soliman","doi":"10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many different technologies were proposed in the past few years for enhancing indoor positioning: WiFi, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Ultra Wide Band (UWB), and Bluetooth to mention some. This study followed the recent IEEE positioning standard (P802.11 az). The standard was developed to enhance indoor navigation by minimizing the consumption power with low hardware complexity. Therefore, this standard enables the usage of artificial intelligence algorithms with relatively high complexity. Also, the usage of this standard will enhance indoor localization and positioning for different commercial purposes. We proposed two methods: Time Of Arrival (TOA) and fingerprinting-deep learning, considering a simple Single Input-Single Input (SISO) system at five Gigahertz with the highest standard allowable bandwidth. The behavior of TOA had very low performance considering a realistic multi-path case. On the other hand, the deep learning algorithm achieved ultra-high indoor positioning resolution (around twelve centimeters). Although TOA is a technique that relies on a simple hardware algorithm relative to deep learning, this paper proved the failure of TOA in a simple indoor environment even using the latest IEEE positioning standard compared with the deep learning method.","PeriodicalId":106639,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSPA55860.2022.10019071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many different technologies were proposed in the past few years for enhancing indoor positioning: WiFi, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Ultra Wide Band (UWB), and Bluetooth to mention some. This study followed the recent IEEE positioning standard (P802.11 az). The standard was developed to enhance indoor navigation by minimizing the consumption power with low hardware complexity. Therefore, this standard enables the usage of artificial intelligence algorithms with relatively high complexity. Also, the usage of this standard will enhance indoor localization and positioning for different commercial purposes. We proposed two methods: Time Of Arrival (TOA) and fingerprinting-deep learning, considering a simple Single Input-Single Input (SISO) system at five Gigahertz with the highest standard allowable bandwidth. The behavior of TOA had very low performance considering a realistic multi-path case. On the other hand, the deep learning algorithm achieved ultra-high indoor positioning resolution (around twelve centimeters). Although TOA is a technique that relies on a simple hardware algorithm relative to deep learning, this paper proved the failure of TOA in a simple indoor environment even using the latest IEEE positioning standard compared with the deep learning method.
基于IEEE P802.11az的混合深度学习/指纹室内定位
在过去的几年里,人们提出了许多不同的技术来增强室内定位:WiFi、射频识别(RFID)、超宽带(UWB)和蓝牙等等。这项研究遵循了最新的IEEE定位标准(P802.11 az)。该标准的开发是为了通过降低硬件复杂性来最小化功耗来增强室内导航。因此,该标准允许使用复杂度相对较高的人工智能算法。此外,该标准的使用将加强室内定位和定位,以满足不同的商业目的。我们提出了两种方法:到达时间(TOA)和指纹深度学习,考虑一个简单的单输入-单输入(SISO)系统在5千兆赫具有最高的标准允许带宽。考虑到实际的多路径情况,TOA行为的性能很低。另一方面,深度学习算法实现了超高的室内定位分辨率(约12厘米)。虽然相对于深度学习,TOA是一种依赖于简单硬件算法的技术,但本文证明了在简单的室内环境下,即使使用最新的IEEE定位标准,与深度学习方法相比,TOA也是失败的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信