Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: implications for the data literacy of researchers

J. Raffaghelli, S. Manca
{"title":"Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: implications for the data literacy of researchers","authors":"J. Raffaghelli, S. Manca","doi":"10.1108/oir-05-2021-0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Although current research has investigated how open research data (ORD) are published, researchers' behaviour of ORD sharing on academic social networks (ASNs) remains insufficiently explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the connections between ORDs publication and social activity to uncover data literacy gaps.Design/methodology/approach This work investigates whether the ORDs publication leads to social activity around the ORDs and their linked published articles to uncover data literacy needs. The social activity was characterised as reads and citations, over the basis of a non-invasive approach supporting this preliminary study. The eventual associations between the social activity and the researchers' profile (scientific domain, gender, region, professional position, reputation) and the quality of the ORD published were investigated to complete this picture. A random sample of ORD items extracted from ResearchGate (752 ORDs) was analysed using quantitative techniques, including descriptive statistics, logistic regression and K-means cluster analysis.Findings The results highlight three main phenomena: (1) Globally, there is still an underdeveloped social activity around self-archived ORDs in ResearchGate, in terms of reads and citations, regardless of the published ORDs quality; (2) disentangling the moderating effects over social activity around ORD spots traditional dynamics within the “innovative” practice of engaging with data practices; (3) a somewhat similar situation of ResearchGate as ASN to other data platforms and repositories, in terms of social activity around ORD, was detected.Research limitations/implications Although the data were collected within a narrow period, the random data collection ensures a representative picture of researchers' practices.Practical implications As per the implications, the study sheds light on data literacy requirements to promote social activity around ORD in the context of open science as a desirable frontier of practice.Originality/value Researchers data literacy across digital systems is still little understood. Although there are many policies and technological infrastructure providing support, the researchers do not make an in-depth use of them.Peer reviewThe peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0255.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-05-2021-0255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Although current research has investigated how open research data (ORD) are published, researchers' behaviour of ORD sharing on academic social networks (ASNs) remains insufficiently explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the connections between ORDs publication and social activity to uncover data literacy gaps.Design/methodology/approach This work investigates whether the ORDs publication leads to social activity around the ORDs and their linked published articles to uncover data literacy needs. The social activity was characterised as reads and citations, over the basis of a non-invasive approach supporting this preliminary study. The eventual associations between the social activity and the researchers' profile (scientific domain, gender, region, professional position, reputation) and the quality of the ORD published were investigated to complete this picture. A random sample of ORD items extracted from ResearchGate (752 ORDs) was analysed using quantitative techniques, including descriptive statistics, logistic regression and K-means cluster analysis.Findings The results highlight three main phenomena: (1) Globally, there is still an underdeveloped social activity around self-archived ORDs in ResearchGate, in terms of reads and citations, regardless of the published ORDs quality; (2) disentangling the moderating effects over social activity around ORD spots traditional dynamics within the “innovative” practice of engaging with data practices; (3) a somewhat similar situation of ResearchGate as ASN to other data platforms and repositories, in terms of social activity around ORD, was detected.Research limitations/implications Although the data were collected within a narrow period, the random data collection ensures a representative picture of researchers' practices.Practical implications As per the implications, the study sheds light on data literacy requirements to promote social activity around ORD in the context of open science as a desirable frontier of practice.Originality/value Researchers data literacy across digital systems is still little understood. Although there are many policies and technological infrastructure providing support, the researchers do not make an in-depth use of them.Peer reviewThe peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0255.
探索ResearchGate上开放研究数据的社会活动:对研究人员数据素养的影响
虽然目前的研究已经调查了开放研究数据(ORD)是如何发布的,但研究人员在学术社交网络(asn)上分享ORD的行为仍然没有得到充分的探讨。本研究的目的是调查ORDs出版与社会活动之间的联系,以揭示数据素养差距。设计/方法/方法本工作调查ORDs的出版是否会导致围绕ORDs及其相关已发表文章的社会活动,以揭示数据素养需求。社会活动的特征是阅读和引用,在非侵入性方法的基础上支持这项初步研究。研究人员调查了社会活动与研究人员个人资料(科学领域、性别、地区、专业职位、声誉)之间的最终联系,以及发表的ORD的质量,以完成这一图景。采用描述性统计、logistic回归和K-means聚类分析等定量分析方法,随机抽取ResearchGate网站上752条ORD条目进行分析。研究结果突出了三个主要现象:(1)无论已发表论文的质量如何,在全球范围内,围绕ResearchGate自归档论文的社交活动仍然不发达,无论是阅读量还是引用量;(2)解开ORD对社会活动的调节效应,发现参与数据实践的“创新”实践中的传统动态;(3)从围绕ORD的社交活动来看,ResearchGate与ASN的情况与其他数据平台和存储库有些相似。虽然数据收集的时间很短,但随机数据收集确保了研究人员实践的代表性。根据影响,该研究揭示了数据素养的要求,以促进在开放科学背景下围绕ORD的社会活动,作为一个理想的实践前沿。独创性/价值研究人员在数字系统中的数据素养仍然很少被理解。虽然有许多政策和技术基础设施提供支持,但研究人员并没有深入利用它们。同行评议这篇文章的同行评议历史可以在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0255。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信