Impacts of Different Arch Stiffness on Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics during Unexpected Gait Termination

Xuanzhen Cen, István Bíró, Yaodong Gu
{"title":"Impacts of Different Arch Stiffness on Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics during Unexpected Gait Termination","authors":"Xuanzhen Cen, István Bíró, Yaodong Gu","doi":"10.1145/3560071.3560074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the lower limb kinematic characteristics of individuals with different arch stiffness during unexpected gait termination (UGT) and to investigate the functional biomechanical adjustment and human compensation mechanism of gait termination related to the morphological characteristics of the foot arch. Sixty-five healthy male subjects were recruited to complete this biomechanical test. An Easy-Foot-Scan scanner was used to acquire the morphological parameters of the foot arch in standing and sitting positions, and the subjects were divided into stiff and flexible arch groups according to the calculated arch stiffness index (ASI). A Vicon motion capture system was used to capture hip, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) kinematic data during the UGT task. It was found that the flexible arch had a significantly greater range of motion (ROM) in the frontal plane of the knee compared to the stiff arch. The stiff arch group showed a greater ROM in the sagittal plane of the ankle joint. The ROM was greater in the flexible arch group in the frontal plane. For the MPJ, the joint angle in the frontal plane was significantly greater in the stiff arch group than in the flexible arch group. The differences in biomechanical characteristics due to different arch stiffnesses were mainly concentrated in the distal joints. During UGT, the arch must bear and distribute the impact load transmitted to the foot. The flexible arch is more easily compressed, thus reducing the medial longitudinal arch height and leading to a limited windlass mechanism.","PeriodicalId":249276,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Medicine and Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3560071.3560074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the lower limb kinematic characteristics of individuals with different arch stiffness during unexpected gait termination (UGT) and to investigate the functional biomechanical adjustment and human compensation mechanism of gait termination related to the morphological characteristics of the foot arch. Sixty-five healthy male subjects were recruited to complete this biomechanical test. An Easy-Foot-Scan scanner was used to acquire the morphological parameters of the foot arch in standing and sitting positions, and the subjects were divided into stiff and flexible arch groups according to the calculated arch stiffness index (ASI). A Vicon motion capture system was used to capture hip, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) kinematic data during the UGT task. It was found that the flexible arch had a significantly greater range of motion (ROM) in the frontal plane of the knee compared to the stiff arch. The stiff arch group showed a greater ROM in the sagittal plane of the ankle joint. The ROM was greater in the flexible arch group in the frontal plane. For the MPJ, the joint angle in the frontal plane was significantly greater in the stiff arch group than in the flexible arch group. The differences in biomechanical characteristics due to different arch stiffnesses were mainly concentrated in the distal joints. During UGT, the arch must bear and distribute the impact load transmitted to the foot. The flexible arch is more easily compressed, thus reducing the medial longitudinal arch height and leading to a limited windlass mechanism.
不同足弓刚度对意外步态终止时下肢关节运动学的影响
本研究的目的是比较不同足弓刚度个体在意外步态终止(UGT)时的下肢运动学特征,探讨足弓形态特征对步态终止的功能生物力学调节和人体补偿机制。65名健康男性受试者被招募来完成这项生物力学测试。采用Easy-Foot-Scan扫描仪获取站立和坐姿足弓形态参数,并根据计算出的足弓刚度指数(ASI)将受试者分为刚性足弓组和柔性足弓组。在UGT任务中,使用Vicon运动捕捉系统捕获髋关节、膝关节、踝关节和跖趾关节(MPJ)的运动学数据。研究发现,与僵硬弓相比,柔性弓在膝关节前平面的活动范围(ROM)明显更大。僵硬弓组在踝关节矢状面显示更大的ROM。关节弓组在额平面的关节活动度更大。对于MPJ,硬弓组关节在前平面的角度明显大于软弓组。不同弓刚度导致的生物力学特征差异主要集中在远端关节。在UGT过程中,拱必须承受并分配传递到足部的冲击载荷。柔性弓更容易被压缩,从而降低了内侧纵向弓的高度,导致有限的起锚机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信