An Intelligent Decision Support Model for Optimal Selection of Machine Tool under Uncertainty: Recent Trends

Ibrahim M. Hezam
{"title":"An Intelligent Decision Support Model for Optimal Selection of Machine Tool under Uncertainty: Recent Trends","authors":"Ibrahim M. Hezam","doi":"10.61356/j.nswa.2023.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scholars have been interested in the subject of machine tool selection as a result of the growing number of different machines and the continuous advancement of technology associated with these machines. The selection of an unsuitable machine tool may lead to a variety of issues, including limitations on production capacities and productivity indicators when taking into account both time and money from an industrial and practical perspective. The present strategy of selecting machine tools, known as multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), relies on the subjective viewpoint the vast majority of the time. When selecting an appropriate machining tool, however, it is necessary to take both the subjective and objective points of view into consideration. This is due to the fact that the objective assessment accurately reflects the performance of the machine tools. As a result, the purpose of this work is to provide a strategy for selecting machine tools that are based on an innovative hybrid MCDM framework. The study was conducted under a neutrosophic environment and using triangular neutrosophic numbers (TNNs). In the beginning, the CRiteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method is used to assess and prioritize the criteria set for the study. Then, the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method is applied to evaluate and rank four machine tools that were selected and used as alternatives in the study. The results indicate that the criteria of maximum spindle speed and linkage accuracy are the most important in determining the best machine tool. Also, the results indicate that the best alternative among the four tools used is FIDLA GTF-28. As a result, the requirements and priorities for research in the future are highlighted. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":169974,"journal":{"name":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many scholars have been interested in the subject of machine tool selection as a result of the growing number of different machines and the continuous advancement of technology associated with these machines. The selection of an unsuitable machine tool may lead to a variety of issues, including limitations on production capacities and productivity indicators when taking into account both time and money from an industrial and practical perspective. The present strategy of selecting machine tools, known as multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), relies on the subjective viewpoint the vast majority of the time. When selecting an appropriate machining tool, however, it is necessary to take both the subjective and objective points of view into consideration. This is due to the fact that the objective assessment accurately reflects the performance of the machine tools. As a result, the purpose of this work is to provide a strategy for selecting machine tools that are based on an innovative hybrid MCDM framework. The study was conducted under a neutrosophic environment and using triangular neutrosophic numbers (TNNs). In the beginning, the CRiteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method is used to assess and prioritize the criteria set for the study. Then, the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method is applied to evaluate and rank four machine tools that were selected and used as alternatives in the study. The results indicate that the criteria of maximum spindle speed and linkage accuracy are the most important in determining the best machine tool. Also, the results indicate that the best alternative among the four tools used is FIDLA GTF-28. As a result, the requirements and priorities for research in the future are highlighted.    
不确定条件下机床优化选择的智能决策支持模型研究进展
由于不同机器的数量不断增加以及与这些机器相关的技术不断进步,许多学者对机床选择这一主题很感兴趣。选择不合适的机床可能会导致各种问题,包括从工业和实际角度考虑时间和金钱时对生产能力和生产率指标的限制。目前的机床选择策略被称为多准则决策(MCDM),它在绝大多数情况下依赖于主观观点。然而,在选择合适的加工工具时,必须同时考虑主观和客观的观点。这是由于客观评价准确地反映了机床的性能。因此,这项工作的目的是提供一种基于创新的混合MCDM框架的机床选择策略。该研究是在中性环境下进行的,使用三角形中性粒细胞数(tnn)。首先,通过标准间相关性的标准重要性(critical)方法用于评估和优先考虑为研究设置的标准。然后,采用加性比评价(ARAS)方法对选择的4种机床进行了评价和排序。结果表明,在确定最佳机床时,最大主轴转速和连杆精度是最重要的标准。结果还表明,在使用的四种工具中,最佳替代工具是FIDLA GTF-28。因此,突出了未来研究的要求和重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信