Political Cycles and Bank Lending in Russia

Zuzana Fungáčová, K. Schoors, L. Solanko, L. Weill
{"title":"Political Cycles and Bank Lending in Russia","authors":"Zuzana Fungáčová, K. Schoors, L. Solanko, L. Weill","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3764763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-owned banks tend to increase lending before elections for the purpose of boosting the reelection odds of incumbent politicians. We employ monthly data on individual banks to study whether Russian banks increased their lending before presidential elections during 2004–2019, a period covering four presidential elections. In contrast to the literature, we find that both state-owned and private banks increased their lending before presidential elections. This result stands for all loans, as well as separately for firm and household loans. The pre-election lending surge is followed by a deterioration of loan quality the following year, indicating the lending increase was not driven by higher growth prospects or some positive economic shock. The effect is substantially greater for large banks and banks more involved in lending activities. Our main finding that all types of banks in Russia increase their lending before presidential elections supports the view that the authorities in an electoral autocracy like Russia can influence lending of both private and state-owned banks for political reasons.","PeriodicalId":253048,"journal":{"name":"BOF: Transition Economies BOFIT Discussion Papers (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOF: Transition Economies BOFIT Discussion Papers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

State-owned banks tend to increase lending before elections for the purpose of boosting the reelection odds of incumbent politicians. We employ monthly data on individual banks to study whether Russian banks increased their lending before presidential elections during 2004–2019, a period covering four presidential elections. In contrast to the literature, we find that both state-owned and private banks increased their lending before presidential elections. This result stands for all loans, as well as separately for firm and household loans. The pre-election lending surge is followed by a deterioration of loan quality the following year, indicating the lending increase was not driven by higher growth prospects or some positive economic shock. The effect is substantially greater for large banks and banks more involved in lending activities. Our main finding that all types of banks in Russia increase their lending before presidential elections supports the view that the authorities in an electoral autocracy like Russia can influence lending of both private and state-owned banks for political reasons.
俄罗斯的政治周期和银行贷款
国有银行倾向于在选举前增加贷款,以提高现任政治家的连任几率。我们使用单个银行的月度数据来研究2004-2019年期间俄罗斯银行是否在总统选举前增加了贷款,这一时期涵盖了四次总统选举。与文献相反,我们发现国有银行和私人银行在总统选举前都增加了贷款。这一结果适用于所有贷款,也适用于企业贷款和家庭贷款。选举前的贷款激增之后,第二年贷款质量恶化,这表明贷款增长不是由更高的增长前景或一些积极的经济冲击推动的。对大型银行和更多参与贷款活动的银行来说,这种影响要大得多。我们的主要发现是,俄罗斯所有类型的银行在总统选举前都会增加贷款,这支持了这样一种观点,即像俄罗斯这样的选举专制国家的当局可以出于政治原因影响私营和国有银行的贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信