Recursion theory and the ‘death tax’

A. Carson, Andrew Gibbons, J. Phillips
{"title":"Recursion theory and the ‘death tax’","authors":"A. Carson, Andrew Gibbons, J. Phillips","doi":"10.1075/JLP.21030.CAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the 2016 US federal election, political actors have weaponized online fake news as a means of gaining\n electoral advantage (Egelhofer and Lecheler 2019). To advance understandings of the actors and methods involved in perpetuating fake news,\n this article focuses on an Australian story that circulated on and offline through different discourses during the 2019 federal election.\n We use content analyses of 100,000 media articles and eight million Facebook posts to trace false claims that the centre-left Labor party\n would introduce an inheritance tax dubbed a ‘death tax’ if it won office. To understand this evolution of ‘death tax’ discourse on and\n offline – and its weaponization by various actors – we draw from existing theorems of agenda setting, backfire effects, and propose our\n own recursion theory.","PeriodicalId":167182,"journal":{"name":"Discourses of Fake News","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourses of Fake News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLP.21030.CAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since the 2016 US federal election, political actors have weaponized online fake news as a means of gaining electoral advantage (Egelhofer and Lecheler 2019). To advance understandings of the actors and methods involved in perpetuating fake news, this article focuses on an Australian story that circulated on and offline through different discourses during the 2019 federal election. We use content analyses of 100,000 media articles and eight million Facebook posts to trace false claims that the centre-left Labor party would introduce an inheritance tax dubbed a ‘death tax’ if it won office. To understand this evolution of ‘death tax’ discourse on and offline – and its weaponization by various actors – we draw from existing theorems of agenda setting, backfire effects, and propose our own recursion theory.
递归理论与“死亡税”
自2016年美国联邦大选以来,政治行动者将网络假新闻武器化,作为获得选举优势的手段(Egelhofer和Lecheler 2019)。为了增进对延续假新闻的行动者和方法的理解,本文重点关注2019年联邦大选期间通过不同话语在网上和线下传播的一个澳大利亚故事。我们对10万篇媒体文章和800万Facebook帖子进行了内容分析,以追踪有关中左翼工党如果赢得大选将引入遗产税(被称为“死亡税”)的虚假说法。为了理解“死亡税”话语在网上和线下的演变——以及它被各种行动者武器化——我们借鉴了现有的议程设置定理、适得其反的效应,并提出了我们自己的递归理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信