Five Years Since Endrew F.: How the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal Have Applied the Endrew F. U.S. Supreme Court Ruling and Why This Matters for Special Education in Schools

Erin Biolchino
{"title":"Five Years Since Endrew F.: How the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal Have Applied the Endrew F. U.S. Supreme Court Ruling and Why This Matters for Special Education in Schools","authors":"Erin Biolchino","doi":"10.1177/10567879221137577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of the U.S. Circuit Court cases following the most recent U.S. Supreme Court decision related to special education: Endrew F. v. Douglas County Sch. Dist. (2017). This article will be helpful for school leaders who are on the front lines of implementing special education law as several implications of the Endrew F. case are considered: (1) reasonable progress is the legal standard, (2) crafting an IEP is an individualized, fact-intensive endeavor, (3) parent involvement is critical, (4) beware procedural errors, (5) the law favors the LRE, and (6) be prepared to fully implement the IEP.","PeriodicalId":409871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Reform","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221137577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the U.S. Circuit Court cases following the most recent U.S. Supreme Court decision related to special education: Endrew F. v. Douglas County Sch. Dist. (2017). This article will be helpful for school leaders who are on the front lines of implementing special education law as several implications of the Endrew F. case are considered: (1) reasonable progress is the legal standard, (2) crafting an IEP is an individualized, fact-intensive endeavor, (3) parent involvement is critical, (4) beware procedural errors, (5) the law favors the LRE, and (6) be prepared to fully implement the IEP.
《安德鲁·F.五年后:美国巡回上诉法院如何应用安德鲁·F.美国最高法院的裁决,以及为什么这对学校的特殊教育很重要》
本文概述了美国最高法院最近关于特殊教育的裁决:安德鲁·f·诉道格拉斯县学区(2017年)。本文将对处于实施特殊教育法第一线的学校领导有所帮助,因为本文考虑了andrew F.案件的几个含义:(1)合理的进展是法律标准,(2)制定IEP是一项个性化的、事实集中的努力,(3)家长参与至关重要,(4)注意程序错误,(5)法律有利于LRE,(6)准备好全面实施IEP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信