{"title":"Word Order in Biblical Hebrew Poetry","authors":"David J. Fuller","doi":"10.28977/JBTR.2019.4.44.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is no understatement that the issue of Biblical Hebrew word order in prophetic and poetic texts is a difficult and foreboding one. Although the last two decades have seen a number of monographs published on BH word order, the difficulty of surveying these works is greatly diminished by their common theoretical background. Knud Lambrecht’s Information Structure and Sentence Form (1994)1) proved immensely influential on the following generations of Hebrew grammarians interested in word order. This study will examine and compare the word-order proposals of Nicholas P. Lunn and Adina Moshavi, as they represent contrasting approaches to the terminology of topic and focus, but are still both very much bound to the same set of questions. Although Moshavi’s corpus was restricted to narrative (specifically Genesis), her criteria for what constituted marked word is similar to that of Lunn, and thus the comparison of the two works is possible in every area except for Moshavi’s deliberate lack of coverage of poetic parallelism. After conducting a critique of the linguistic viability of this topic/focus framework, this study will suggest a new way forward for understanding non-canonical word order in Hebrew poetry, using","PeriodicalId":283625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Text Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Text Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28977/JBTR.2019.4.44.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
It is no understatement that the issue of Biblical Hebrew word order in prophetic and poetic texts is a difficult and foreboding one. Although the last two decades have seen a number of monographs published on BH word order, the difficulty of surveying these works is greatly diminished by their common theoretical background. Knud Lambrecht’s Information Structure and Sentence Form (1994)1) proved immensely influential on the following generations of Hebrew grammarians interested in word order. This study will examine and compare the word-order proposals of Nicholas P. Lunn and Adina Moshavi, as they represent contrasting approaches to the terminology of topic and focus, but are still both very much bound to the same set of questions. Although Moshavi’s corpus was restricted to narrative (specifically Genesis), her criteria for what constituted marked word is similar to that of Lunn, and thus the comparison of the two works is possible in every area except for Moshavi’s deliberate lack of coverage of poetic parallelism. After conducting a critique of the linguistic viability of this topic/focus framework, this study will suggest a new way forward for understanding non-canonical word order in Hebrew poetry, using
毫不夸张地说,圣经希伯来语在预言和诗歌文本中的语序问题是一个困难和不祥的问题。虽然在过去的二十年中已经看到了一些关于BH语序的专著出版,但由于它们的共同理论背景,测量这些作品的难度大大降低了。Knud Lambrecht的《信息结构和句子形式》(1994)对后来几代对词序感兴趣的希伯来语法学家产生了巨大的影响。本研究将考察和比较Nicholas P. Lunn和Adina Moshavi的语序建议,因为他们代表了主题和焦点术语的不同方法,但仍然非常受同一组问题的约束。尽管莫沙维的语料库仅限于叙事(特别是《创世纪》),但她对构成标记词的标准与伦的相似,因此,除了莫沙维故意缺乏对诗歌平行的覆盖外,这两部作品在每个领域都可以进行比较。在对这一主题/焦点框架的语言学可行性进行了批评之后,本研究将为理解希伯来诗歌中的非规范词序提供一种新的方法