Analysis on the Case Category of Yeniseian Languages: Focusing on Ket Language

Jung Hyun Hong
{"title":"Analysis on the Case Category of Yeniseian Languages: Focusing on Ket Language","authors":"Jung Hyun Hong","doi":"10.24958/rh.2023.27.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this study is the case category system of Ket language, the only existing language of the Yeniseian languages. After examining the usage of each case and case marker, we analyzed the singular/plural category, male/non-male category, animate/inanimate binary confrontation structure, which are important standards for the classification of cases of Ket language. \nKet nouns are first classified into singular and plural, and if singular, they are classified into male/non-male categories, and if plural, they are classified into animate/inanimate categories. The three gender categories for nouns, which are male, female, and neutral, cannot be seen as a morphological difference in nominatives. Gender categories only play a dominant role in genetive case and dative, ablative, benefactive and adessive cases, which are made in basis of genetive case. \nIt was found that it is reasonable to view the dative, ablative, benefactive, and adessive, which have binary structure according to male/non-male and animate/inanimate, as a declinable case. Locative, instrumental, abessive and prosecutive have no distinction between male/non-male, animate/inanimate, and they do not change according to the number and gender, so the case markers for these nouns are similar to case suffixes or propositions. As for the vocative, it has a male/female binary structure in singular, but they don’t have any confrontation structure in plural, which is very different from other standards. \nAs such, the Ket language system does not have a clear system that appears in Indo-European languages due to the correlation between the confrontational structure of the class, the hierarchy of the class, and the postposition. So the Yeniseian language case system should be viewed as a binary structure, which has a declinable group(nominative, genetive, dative, ablative, benefactive, adessive, vocative) and indeclinable group(locative, instumental, prosecutive, abessive).","PeriodicalId":431674,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24958/rh.2023.27.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this study is the case category system of Ket language, the only existing language of the Yeniseian languages. After examining the usage of each case and case marker, we analyzed the singular/plural category, male/non-male category, animate/inanimate binary confrontation structure, which are important standards for the classification of cases of Ket language. Ket nouns are first classified into singular and plural, and if singular, they are classified into male/non-male categories, and if plural, they are classified into animate/inanimate categories. The three gender categories for nouns, which are male, female, and neutral, cannot be seen as a morphological difference in nominatives. Gender categories only play a dominant role in genetive case and dative, ablative, benefactive and adessive cases, which are made in basis of genetive case. It was found that it is reasonable to view the dative, ablative, benefactive, and adessive, which have binary structure according to male/non-male and animate/inanimate, as a declinable case. Locative, instrumental, abessive and prosecutive have no distinction between male/non-male, animate/inanimate, and they do not change according to the number and gender, so the case markers for these nouns are similar to case suffixes or propositions. As for the vocative, it has a male/female binary structure in singular, but they don’t have any confrontation structure in plural, which is very different from other standards. As such, the Ket language system does not have a clear system that appears in Indo-European languages due to the correlation between the confrontational structure of the class, the hierarchy of the class, and the postposition. So the Yeniseian language case system should be viewed as a binary structure, which has a declinable group(nominative, genetive, dative, ablative, benefactive, adessive, vocative) and indeclinable group(locative, instumental, prosecutive, abessive).
叶尼塞语格类分析——以偈语为例
本文研究的对象是叶尼塞语族中唯一现存的克族语的格类系统。在考察了各格和格标记用法的基础上,分析了克语格的单复数范畴、男性/非男性范畴、有生命/无生命二元对立结构,这是克语格分类的重要标准。Ket名词首先分为单数和复数,如果是单数,则分为男性/非男性类别,如果是复数,则分为有生命/无生命类别。名词的三种性别类别,即男性、女性和中性,不能被视为主格的形态差异。性别范畴仅在遗传格和以遗传格为基础的格、格、格、格、格中起主导作用。研究发现,根据男性/非男性和有生命/无生命的二元结构,将与格、消融格、有益格和附格视为一种可递减的情况是合理的。定位词、工具词、霸格词和诉格词没有男性/非男性、有生命/无生命之分,也不随数量和性别的变化而变化,因此这些名词的格标记与格后缀或格命题类似。就呼召词而言,它在单数时有男女二元结构,而在复数时却没有任何对抗结构,这与其他标准有很大的不同。因此,由于类的对抗结构、类的等级和后置的关系,Ket语言系统并没有出现在印欧语言中的清晰系统。因此,叶尼塞语的格系统应该被看作是一个二元结构,它有一个可降格组(主格、属格、格格、蚀格、恩格、附格、呼格)和不可降格组(位格、工具格、诉格、格格)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信