Complexity Lower Bounds from Algorithm Design

Richard Ryan Williams
{"title":"Complexity Lower Bounds from Algorithm Design","authors":"Richard Ryan Williams","doi":"10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the beginning of the theory of computation, researchers have been fascinated by the prospect of proving impossibility results on computing. When and how can we argue that a task cannot be efficiently solved, no matter what algorithm we try to use?In this short article, I will briefly introduce some of the ideas behind a research program in computational complexity that I and others have studied, for the last decade. (The accompanying talk will contain more details.) The program begins with the observations that:(a) Computer scientists know a great deal about how to design efficient algorithms.(b) However, we do not know how to prove many weak-looking complexity lower bounds.It turns out that certain knowledge we have from (a) can be leveraged to prove complexity lower bounds in a systematic way, making progress on (b). For example, progress on faster circuit satisfiability algorithms (even those that barely improve upon exhaustive search) automatically imply circuit complexity lower bounds for interesting functions.1","PeriodicalId":174663,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the beginning of the theory of computation, researchers have been fascinated by the prospect of proving impossibility results on computing. When and how can we argue that a task cannot be efficiently solved, no matter what algorithm we try to use?In this short article, I will briefly introduce some of the ideas behind a research program in computational complexity that I and others have studied, for the last decade. (The accompanying talk will contain more details.) The program begins with the observations that:(a) Computer scientists know a great deal about how to design efficient algorithms.(b) However, we do not know how to prove many weak-looking complexity lower bounds.It turns out that certain knowledge we have from (a) can be leveraged to prove complexity lower bounds in a systematic way, making progress on (b). For example, progress on faster circuit satisfiability algorithms (even those that barely improve upon exhaustive search) automatically imply circuit complexity lower bounds for interesting functions.1
算法设计的复杂度下界
自计算理论诞生以来,研究人员一直着迷于在计算上证明不可能结果的前景。无论我们尝试使用什么算法,我们何时以及如何认为一项任务无法有效解决?在这篇简短的文章中,我将简要介绍我和其他人在过去十年中研究的计算复杂性研究项目背后的一些思想。(随附的演讲将包含更多细节。)该计划以观察结果开始:(a)计算机科学家对如何设计有效的算法知道很多,(b)然而,我们不知道如何证明许多看起来很弱的复杂性下界。事实证明,我们从(a)中获得的某些知识可以用于以系统的方式证明复杂性下界,从而在(b)上取得进展。例如,在更快的电路可满足性算法(即使是那些几乎没有改进穷举搜索的算法)上的进展自动暗示了有趣函数的电路复杂性下界
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信