Current evidence for outcomes of free-flap reconstruction in factor V Leiden patients

I. Yeap, C. Ahn, Stuart N Hoffman, R. Gillies, J. Vandervord
{"title":"Current evidence for outcomes of free-flap reconstruction in factor V Leiden patients","authors":"I. Yeap, C. Ahn, Stuart N Hoffman, R. Gillies, J. Vandervord","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v2n2.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Factor V Leiden is the most common form of inherited thrombophilic syndrome, affecting five per cent of caucasians. While increased rates of venous thromboembolic complications have been regularly reported in factor V Leiden patients, little is known about their risk of microvascular complications or flap failure rates in free-flap surgery. The aim of this review is to qualitatively review the published literature on outcomes of free-flap surgery in patients with factor V Leiden. \nMethods: MEDLINE®, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched from their dates of inception to March 2017. Nine studies of level IV evidence were included in this qualitative review. In total, these studies included 22 patients who underwent 24 free-flap operations. \nResults: Nine flap failures were reported due to thrombotic complications. Even heterozygous factor V Leiden patients had a relatively high risk of free-flap failure (3/15 free flaps), and patients who were heterozygous for factor V Leiden and had other coexistent thrombophilias had an even higher failure rate (5/6 free flaps). However, the small sample size across the nine studies, as well as the inevitable publication bias, means that definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. \nConclusion: Despite factor V Leiden being a relatively common condition in Australia, current evidence for outcomes of free-flap reconstruction in this patient population is lacking.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2n2.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Factor V Leiden is the most common form of inherited thrombophilic syndrome, affecting five per cent of caucasians. While increased rates of venous thromboembolic complications have been regularly reported in factor V Leiden patients, little is known about their risk of microvascular complications or flap failure rates in free-flap surgery. The aim of this review is to qualitatively review the published literature on outcomes of free-flap surgery in patients with factor V Leiden. Methods: MEDLINE®, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched from their dates of inception to March 2017. Nine studies of level IV evidence were included in this qualitative review. In total, these studies included 22 patients who underwent 24 free-flap operations. Results: Nine flap failures were reported due to thrombotic complications. Even heterozygous factor V Leiden patients had a relatively high risk of free-flap failure (3/15 free flaps), and patients who were heterozygous for factor V Leiden and had other coexistent thrombophilias had an even higher failure rate (5/6 free flaps). However, the small sample size across the nine studies, as well as the inevitable publication bias, means that definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Conclusion: Despite factor V Leiden being a relatively common condition in Australia, current evidence for outcomes of free-flap reconstruction in this patient population is lacking.
游离皮瓣重建在V型Leiden患者中的效果
背景:Leiden因子V是遗传性血栓性综合征最常见的形式,影响了5%的高加索人。虽然在V - Leiden因子患者中静脉血栓栓塞并发症发生率的增加已被定期报道,但对其在自由皮瓣手术中微血管并发症的风险或皮瓣失败率知之甚少。本综述的目的是对已发表的关于游离皮瓣手术治疗V型Leiden患者结果的文献进行定性回顾。方法:检索MEDLINE®、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane自成立之日至2017年3月。本定性评价纳入了9项IV级证据的研究。这些研究总共包括22例接受24次游离皮瓣手术的患者。结果:9例因血栓并发症导致皮瓣失效。即使是杂合的V - Leiden因子患者也有较高的游离皮瓣失败的风险(3/15个游离皮瓣),而杂合的V - Leiden因子与其他血栓性疾病共存的患者失败率更高(5/6个游离皮瓣)。然而,9项研究的样本量较小,以及不可避免的发表偏倚,意味着无法得出明确的结论。结论:尽管V - Leiden因子在澳大利亚是一种相对常见的疾病,但目前关于游离皮瓣重建在该患者群体中的效果的证据还很缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信