Methodologies for characterising and valuing energy security — A short critical review

A. Månsson, Bengt Johansson, Lars J Nilsson
{"title":"Methodologies for characterising and valuing energy security — A short critical review","authors":"A. Månsson, Bengt Johansson, Lars J Nilsson","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security of supply is widely addressed in the academia. In this paper we conduct a review of methodologies, discuss strengths and weaknesses and identify areas that would benefit from further research and methodology development. A distinction is made between methodologies used to assess general vulnerability and those that value the outcome of insecurity by testing how energy systems respond to disturbances. The former group contains methods that value scarcity of primary fuels, reliable infrastructure, import dependence, economic factors, diversity and those that are used to simultaneously analyse several of these aspects. Disturbances that are analysed are shortage of primary fuel, system failure (caused deliberately or accidently), the end users' cost of a power outage and price spikes.","PeriodicalId":383754,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Security of supply is widely addressed in the academia. In this paper we conduct a review of methodologies, discuss strengths and weaknesses and identify areas that would benefit from further research and methodology development. A distinction is made between methodologies used to assess general vulnerability and those that value the outcome of insecurity by testing how energy systems respond to disturbances. The former group contains methods that value scarcity of primary fuels, reliable infrastructure, import dependence, economic factors, diversity and those that are used to simultaneously analyse several of these aspects. Disturbances that are analysed are shortage of primary fuel, system failure (caused deliberately or accidently), the end users' cost of a power outage and price spikes.
表征和评价能源安全的方法。简要评述
供给安全是学术界广泛讨论的问题。在本文中,我们对方法进行了回顾,讨论了优点和缺点,并确定了将从进一步的研究和方法开发中受益的领域。对用于评估一般脆弱性的方法和通过测试能源系统如何应对干扰来评估不安全后果的方法进行了区分。前一组方法包括重视初级燃料的稀缺性、可靠的基础设施、进口依赖性、经济因素、多样性和同时分析这些方面若干方面的方法。分析的干扰包括初级燃料短缺、系统故障(有意或无意造成的)、最终用户的停电成本和价格飙升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信