Laser ablation of surgical margins after excisional partial vulvectomy for VIN: Effect on recurrence.

John V. Brown, B. Goldstein, M. Rettenmaier, M. Aylward, C. Graham, J. Micha
{"title":"Laser ablation of surgical margins after excisional partial vulvectomy for VIN: Effect on recurrence.","authors":"John V. Brown, B. Goldstein, M. Rettenmaier, M. Aylward, C. Graham, J. Micha","doi":"10.1097/01.OGX.0000175797.73644.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the recurrence rates in patients who underwent different surgical treatments for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 2 and 3.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nData on every patient who underwent surgical treatment for VIN 2 or 3 between January 1994 and December 2002 by a single gynecologic oncologist were retrospectively reviewed. The recurrence rates for 3 different surgical therapies were analyzed using Fischer's exact test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThirty-three patients, who had a median age of 46 years (range, 31-80), were identified. The preoperative biopsy demonstrated VIN 2 or 3 in 9.1% and 90.9% of the patients, respectively. The following primary surgical procedures were employed: 16 patients (48.4%) underwent excisional partial vulvectomy with CO2 laser ablation of the margins, 10 patients (30.3%) had CO2 laser ablation alone, 6 patients (18.2%) had an excisional partial vulvectomy, and 1 patient (3.0%) was. treated with the ultrasonic surgical aspirator. No patient had invasive disease. Recurrent disease was seen in 7 patients (70.0%) treated by laser alone, 3 patients (50.0%) who had an excisional partial vulvectomy and 1 patient (6.25%) who underwent a combined laser and excisional partial vulvectomy (p = 0.0016).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe results of this small study suggest that laser and excisional partial vulvectomy for the treatment of VIN 2 and 3 may be associated with a lower recurrence rate than either modality alone. A larger study will be needed to confirm these results.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000175797.73644.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the recurrence rates in patients who underwent different surgical treatments for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 2 and 3. STUDY DESIGN Data on every patient who underwent surgical treatment for VIN 2 or 3 between January 1994 and December 2002 by a single gynecologic oncologist were retrospectively reviewed. The recurrence rates for 3 different surgical therapies were analyzed using Fischer's exact test. RESULTS Thirty-three patients, who had a median age of 46 years (range, 31-80), were identified. The preoperative biopsy demonstrated VIN 2 or 3 in 9.1% and 90.9% of the patients, respectively. The following primary surgical procedures were employed: 16 patients (48.4%) underwent excisional partial vulvectomy with CO2 laser ablation of the margins, 10 patients (30.3%) had CO2 laser ablation alone, 6 patients (18.2%) had an excisional partial vulvectomy, and 1 patient (3.0%) was. treated with the ultrasonic surgical aspirator. No patient had invasive disease. Recurrent disease was seen in 7 patients (70.0%) treated by laser alone, 3 patients (50.0%) who had an excisional partial vulvectomy and 1 patient (6.25%) who underwent a combined laser and excisional partial vulvectomy (p = 0.0016). CONCLUSION The results of this small study suggest that laser and excisional partial vulvectomy for the treatment of VIN 2 and 3 may be associated with a lower recurrence rate than either modality alone. A larger study will be needed to confirm these results.
外阴部分切除术后边缘激光消融治疗VIN:对复发的影响。
目的探讨外阴上皮内瘤变(VIN) 2、3术后不同手术治疗的复发率。研究设计回顾性分析了1994年1月至2002年12月期间由一名妇科肿瘤学家接受2或3型VIN手术治疗的每位患者的资料。采用Fischer精确检验法分析3种不同手术治疗的复发率。结果33例患者,中位年龄46岁(范围31-80岁)。术前活检显示VIN 2或3分别为9.1%和90.9%的患者。本研究采用的主要手术方式为:16例(48.4%)患者行外阴部分切除联合边缘CO2激光消融,10例(30.3%)患者行单纯CO2激光消融,6例(18.2%)患者行外阴部分切除,1例(3.0%)患者行单纯CO2激光消融。超声手术吸引器治疗。无患者有侵袭性疾病。单纯激光治疗7例(70.0%)复发,切除部分外阴切除术3例(50.0%)复发,激光联合切除部分外阴切除术1例(6.25%)复发(p = 0.0016)。结论本研究结果提示,激光和切除部分外阴切除术治疗VIN 2和3可能比单独使用任何一种方式的复发率低。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信