Obaveza ljekara na pružanje medicinskih usluga v. prigovor savjesti u medicini

Maja Čolaković, Herzegovina
{"title":"Obaveza ljekara na pružanje medicinskih usluga v. prigovor savjesti u medicini","authors":"Maja Čolaković, Herzegovina","doi":"10.18690/978-961-286-478-1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patient's right to available and accessible healthcare is correlated with the physician's obligation to provide the appropriate medical services. More recently, in medical practice in several countries, there have been an increasing number of cases where physicians (and other healthcare providers) refuse to provide a specific medical service, referring to their religious and moral beliefs i.e. the right to conscientious objection. Do physicians violate their professional obligation to act for the benefit of the patient and provide the necessary medical services? Does this interfere with the patient's right to self-determination and his other rights? Does this lead to discrimination against patients and indirect imposition of physicians' moral and religious beliefs? These are just several questions raised in theory and practice due to the conscientious objection in medicine. This paper explores the doctrinal and legislative approaches of the right to conscientious objection in medicine in Europe and worldwide.","PeriodicalId":220685,"journal":{"name":"Medicina, pravo in družba: sodobne dileme IV","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina, pravo in družba: sodobne dileme IV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-478-1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patient's right to available and accessible healthcare is correlated with the physician's obligation to provide the appropriate medical services. More recently, in medical practice in several countries, there have been an increasing number of cases where physicians (and other healthcare providers) refuse to provide a specific medical service, referring to their religious and moral beliefs i.e. the right to conscientious objection. Do physicians violate their professional obligation to act for the benefit of the patient and provide the necessary medical services? Does this interfere with the patient's right to self-determination and his other rights? Does this lead to discrimination against patients and indirect imposition of physicians' moral and religious beliefs? These are just several questions raised in theory and practice due to the conscientious objection in medicine. This paper explores the doctrinal and legislative approaches of the right to conscientious objection in medicine in Europe and worldwide.
患者获得现有和可获得的医疗保健的权利与医生提供适当医疗服务的义务是相关的。最近,在一些国家的医疗实践中,医生(和其他保健提供者)以其宗教和道德信仰(即出于良心拒服兵役的权利)为由拒绝提供特定医疗服务的案例越来越多。医生是否违反了他们为病人利益行事和提供必要医疗服务的职业义务?这是否妨碍了病人的自决权和其他权利?这是否会导致对病人的歧视和医生的道德和宗教信仰的间接强加?这些只是由于医学上的良心反对而在理论和实践中提出的几个问题。本文探讨了欧洲和世界范围内医学中良心拒服兵役权的理论和立法途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信