Comparison of ADV measured near-bed orbital speed and latter derived from wave gauge measurements at intermediate water depths

V. Alari, U. Raudsepp, A. Erm
{"title":"Comparison of ADV measured near-bed orbital speed and latter derived from wave gauge measurements at intermediate water depths","authors":"V. Alari, U. Raudsepp, A. Erm","doi":"10.1109/BALTIC.2010.5621625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to assess the applicability of the pressure wave gauge to measure wind waves at transitional water depths. In this study, a rather uncommon method is proposed to check the validity of the linear wave theory. Namely, we compare the wave induced near-bed velocities measured directly with the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) to those calculated from wave gauge measurements. A subsurface mooring station equipped with an ADV and a pressure wave gauge was deployed in Keibu Bay, a small coastal environment in the southern Gulf of Finland, at a depth of 7 m in June 2010. Among long period oscillations, i.e. currents, the ADV allowed measuring wind wave induced orbital velocities. The ADV was set to measure orbital velocities 27 cm above the bottom at 2 Hz, while the pressure sensor of the wave gauge was 5 m from the bottom and measured pressure at 4 Hz continuously. After removing turbulent velocity from the ADV measurements, the combined horizontal spectrum was calculated and the bottom orbital speed was derived. The surface elevation spectra were estimated from the pressure measurements and the near-bed orbital speed was calculated from the wave spectra. The measurement campaign was characterized by diverse wave activity. It presents growing wind seas, fetch limited, swell and mixed sea states. The maximum significant wave height was 1.12 m. The wave data obtained were examined for their region of validity in the framework of Stokes' and Airy's wave theories. 80 % of data were in the range of Stokes' wave theory. The comparison of the ADV measured near-bed orbital speed and the data derived from wave gauge measurements showed remarkable agreement. The correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the root-mean-square error for orbital speed was 1.2 cm/s. During the largest wave event, the measured near-bed orbital speed reached 25.8 cm/s over a 5-minute period, and the calculated speed was 25.2 cm/s. In conclusion, the pressure data measured in coastal seas can be transformed into surface waves via the linear wave theory.","PeriodicalId":287473,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2010.5621625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the applicability of the pressure wave gauge to measure wind waves at transitional water depths. In this study, a rather uncommon method is proposed to check the validity of the linear wave theory. Namely, we compare the wave induced near-bed velocities measured directly with the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) to those calculated from wave gauge measurements. A subsurface mooring station equipped with an ADV and a pressure wave gauge was deployed in Keibu Bay, a small coastal environment in the southern Gulf of Finland, at a depth of 7 m in June 2010. Among long period oscillations, i.e. currents, the ADV allowed measuring wind wave induced orbital velocities. The ADV was set to measure orbital velocities 27 cm above the bottom at 2 Hz, while the pressure sensor of the wave gauge was 5 m from the bottom and measured pressure at 4 Hz continuously. After removing turbulent velocity from the ADV measurements, the combined horizontal spectrum was calculated and the bottom orbital speed was derived. The surface elevation spectra were estimated from the pressure measurements and the near-bed orbital speed was calculated from the wave spectra. The measurement campaign was characterized by diverse wave activity. It presents growing wind seas, fetch limited, swell and mixed sea states. The maximum significant wave height was 1.12 m. The wave data obtained were examined for their region of validity in the framework of Stokes' and Airy's wave theories. 80 % of data were in the range of Stokes' wave theory. The comparison of the ADV measured near-bed orbital speed and the data derived from wave gauge measurements showed remarkable agreement. The correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the root-mean-square error for orbital speed was 1.2 cm/s. During the largest wave event, the measured near-bed orbital speed reached 25.8 cm/s over a 5-minute period, and the calculated speed was 25.2 cm/s. In conclusion, the pressure data measured in coastal seas can be transformed into surface waves via the linear wave theory.
ADV测得的近床轨道速度与中间水深波计测得的轨道速度的比较
本研究的目的是评估压力波计在过渡水深测量风浪的适用性。在这项研究中,提出了一种相当罕见的方法来检验线性波理论的有效性。也就是说,我们将声波多普勒测速仪(ADV)直接测量的波致近床速度与测波仪测量的结果进行了比较。2010年6月,在芬兰海湾南部的一个小型沿海环境Keibu Bay部署了一个配备ADV和压力波计的地下系泊站,深度为7米。在长周期振荡中,即电流,ADV允许测量风波引起的轨道速度。ADV以2hz频率测量距底部27 cm的轨道速度,测波仪的压力传感器位于距底部5 m处,以4hz频率连续测量压力。在去除ADV测量数据中的湍流速度后,计算了组合水平谱,并推导了底部轨道速度。根据压力测量估计地表高程谱,根据波谱计算近床轨道速度。测量活动的特点是不同的波浪活动。主要表现为大风海、有限海况、汹涌海况和混合海况。最大有效波高1.12 m。在Stokes和Airy波浪理论的框架下,对所获得的波浪数据的有效区域进行了检验。80%的数据在Stokes的波动理论范围内。ADV测得的近床轨道速度与波计测得的数据的比较显示出显著的一致性。相关系数为0.98,轨道速度的均方根误差为1.2 cm/s。在最大的波事件中,测量到的近层轨道速度在5分钟内达到25.8 cm/s,计算速度为25.2 cm/s。综上所述,利用线性波理论可以将沿海海域实测的压力数据转化为表面波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信