Streptococcus agalactiae: colonização de gestantes de alto risco em um hospital regional da Amazônia brasileira e perfil de sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos

Edlainny Araujo Ribeiro, Geórgia Miranda Tomich, Brena de Almeida Costa, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Lorrany Karen Batista de Jesus
{"title":"Streptococcus agalactiae: colonização de gestantes de alto risco em um hospital regional da Amazônia brasileira e perfil de sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos","authors":"Edlainny Araujo Ribeiro, Geórgia Miranda Tomich, Brena de Almeida Costa, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Lorrany Karen Batista de Jesus","doi":"10.5123/s2176-6223202100542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \n \nINTRODUCTION: \nGroup B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae in immunosuppressed individuals, such as neonates, can result in a series of complications and diseases, which can even lead to death. \n \n \nOBJECTIVES: \nTo characterize the clinical-epidemiological profile of pregnant women colonized by S. agalactiae and determine the isolates' sensitivity profile in a hospital in the Amazon. \n \n \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: \nClinical specimens were collected from March 15 to April 15, 2019, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The phenotypic identification was performed according to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), and for the antimicrobial sensitivity testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute specifications were followed. \n \n \nRESULTS: \nColonization by GBS was found in 34.0% of the pregnant women; the most frequent chronic diseases were hypertension (26.0%) and diabetes (10.0%). The antimicrobials linezolid, vancomycin, and meropenem were the most effective against the bacteria. There was a high resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (82.4%) and chloramphenicol (70.6%); 88.2% of the strains analyzed were multidrug-resistant. \n \n \nCONCLUSION: \nThe presence of GBS among high-risk pregnant women and the detection of multidrug-resistant strains, including those with resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, bring up the importance of screening for the detection of this bacteria during pregnancy and the beginning of antibiotic prophylaxis, emphasizing the need to adapt the practice of local prenatal care to the current recommendations.","PeriodicalId":285768,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5123/s2176-6223202100542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Group B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae in immunosuppressed individuals, such as neonates, can result in a series of complications and diseases, which can even lead to death. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical-epidemiological profile of pregnant women colonized by S. agalactiae and determine the isolates' sensitivity profile in a hospital in the Amazon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical specimens were collected from March 15 to April 15, 2019, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The phenotypic identification was performed according to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), and for the antimicrobial sensitivity testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute specifications were followed. RESULTS: Colonization by GBS was found in 34.0% of the pregnant women; the most frequent chronic diseases were hypertension (26.0%) and diabetes (10.0%). The antimicrobials linezolid, vancomycin, and meropenem were the most effective against the bacteria. There was a high resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (82.4%) and chloramphenicol (70.6%); 88.2% of the strains analyzed were multidrug-resistant. CONCLUSION: The presence of GBS among high-risk pregnant women and the detection of multidrug-resistant strains, including those with resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, bring up the importance of screening for the detection of this bacteria during pregnancy and the beginning of antibiotic prophylaxis, emphasizing the need to adapt the practice of local prenatal care to the current recommendations.
无乳链球菌:巴西亚马逊地区医院高危孕妇的定植和抗菌药物敏感性概况
摘要简介:免疫抑制个体(如新生儿)感染B族链球菌(GBS)或无乳链球菌可导致一系列并发症和疾病,甚至可导致死亡。目的:了解亚马逊地区某医院感染无乳链球菌的孕妇的临床流行病学特征,并确定分离株的敏感性。材料与方法:按照美国疾病控制与预防中心的指导方针,于2019年3月15日至4月15日采集临床标本。表型鉴定根据巴西卫生监管机构(Anvisa)进行,抗菌药物敏感性测试遵循临床和实验室标准研究所的规范。结果:34.0%的孕妇有GBS定植;最常见的慢性病是高血压(26.0%)和糖尿病(10.0%)。抗菌药物利奈唑胺、万古霉素和美罗培南对细菌最有效。对环丙沙星(82.4%)和氯霉素(70.6%)的耐药率较高;88.2%的菌株具有多重耐药。结论:GBS在高危孕妇中的存在以及多药耐药菌株(包括青霉素和头孢菌素耐药菌株)的检测,提示在妊娠期间筛查该细菌的检测和开始抗生素预防的重要性,强调需要使当地产前护理实践适应目前的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信