Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Contemporary Update and Ongoing Controversies for the Clinician in the Trenches

M. Rosner, C. Zelop
{"title":"Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Contemporary Update and Ongoing Controversies for the Clinician in the Trenches","authors":"M. Rosner, C. Zelop","doi":"10.2310/obg.19059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mounting evidence underscoring serious maternal complications such as hemorrhage, emergent hysterectomy, thromboembolic disease and even death from multiple cesarean deliveries has refocused attention upon trial of labor after cesarean birth.  Research over the last thirty years has provided insight into some of the clinical and demographic factors associated with uterine rupture and successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clinical application of these strategies has the potential to mitigate the dilemma for physicians in the trenches caused by fear of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean.  Individual risk stratification of candidates that optimizes success and minimizes uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean shows promise for implementation of best practices leading to favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes.\nThis review contains 4 figures, 6 tables, and 97 references.\nKey Words: Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), uterine rupture, uterine scar, lower uterine segment, repeat cesarean, placenta accreta, uterine dehiscence","PeriodicalId":120074,"journal":{"name":"DeckerMed Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DeckerMed Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/obg.19059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mounting evidence underscoring serious maternal complications such as hemorrhage, emergent hysterectomy, thromboembolic disease and even death from multiple cesarean deliveries has refocused attention upon trial of labor after cesarean birth.  Research over the last thirty years has provided insight into some of the clinical and demographic factors associated with uterine rupture and successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clinical application of these strategies has the potential to mitigate the dilemma for physicians in the trenches caused by fear of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean.  Individual risk stratification of candidates that optimizes success and minimizes uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean shows promise for implementation of best practices leading to favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. This review contains 4 figures, 6 tables, and 97 references. Key Words: Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), uterine rupture, uterine scar, lower uterine segment, repeat cesarean, placenta accreta, uterine dehiscence
剖宫产后阴道分娩:当代更新和持续争议的临床医生在战壕
越来越多的证据强调了严重的产妇并发症,如出血、紧急子宫切除术、血栓栓塞性疾病甚至多次剖宫产死亡,这使人们重新关注剖宫产后的分娩试验。过去三十年的研究提供了一些与剖宫产后子宫破裂和成功分娩相关的临床和人口因素的见解。这些策略的临床应用有可能缓解医生在剖宫产后分娩试验中因担心子宫破裂而造成的困境。个体风险分层的候选人,优化成功和最大限度地减少子宫破裂在剖宫产后的分娩试验中显示了实施最佳实践的希望,导致有利的孕产妇和新生儿的结果。本综述包含4图6表97篇参考文献。关键词:剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC),剖宫产后试产(TOLAC),子宫破裂,子宫瘢痕,子宫下段,重复剖宫产,胎盘增生,子宫裂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信