An evaluation of chord using traces of peer-to-peer file sharing

Jacky Chu, Kevin Labonte, B. Levine
{"title":"An evaluation of chord using traces of peer-to-peer file sharing","authors":"Jacky Chu, Kevin Labonte, B. Levine","doi":"10.1145/1005686.1005753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the effectiveness of the Chord [1] as a protocol for file sharing using measurements from a real P2P application. Chord has several problems when used to support content sharing. The heavy-tail distributions we measured relating to queries and transfers results in a very unbalanced workload for Chord peers. Caches at nodes are helpful, but do not remove a unbalanced workload with a power-law skew. Our measurements are from a real P2P file-sharing protocol implementation based on a centralized architecture: users sent queries to a server that maintained a database of the current peers and their shared libraries. Users explicitly consented to our anonymized logging of their actions. Twice a day, a snapshot of users and their shared files was dumped Since we have a record of every query, and every transfer between users resulting from queries, the only information we are missing is the exact time when files in users’ libraries are added to the system out-of-band. This data revealed downloading habits of users that are independent of the underlying network file transferring architecture. We obtained a Chord simulator from the Chord project homepage [1].","PeriodicalId":172626,"journal":{"name":"SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1005686.1005753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of the Chord [1] as a protocol for file sharing using measurements from a real P2P application. Chord has several problems when used to support content sharing. The heavy-tail distributions we measured relating to queries and transfers results in a very unbalanced workload for Chord peers. Caches at nodes are helpful, but do not remove a unbalanced workload with a power-law skew. Our measurements are from a real P2P file-sharing protocol implementation based on a centralized architecture: users sent queries to a server that maintained a database of the current peers and their shared libraries. Users explicitly consented to our anonymized logging of their actions. Twice a day, a snapshot of users and their shared files was dumped Since we have a record of every query, and every transfer between users resulting from queries, the only information we are missing is the exact time when files in users’ libraries are added to the system out-of-band. This data revealed downloading habits of users that are independent of the underlying network file transferring architecture. We obtained a Chord simulator from the Chord project homepage [1].
使用点对点文件共享的痕迹对chord进行评估
我们使用来自真实P2P应用程序的测量来评估Chord[1]作为文件共享协议的有效性。Chord在支持内容共享时存在几个问题。我们测量的与查询和传输相关的重尾分布导致Chord对等节点的工作负载非常不平衡。节点上的缓存是有帮助的,但不能消除幂律倾斜的不平衡工作负载。我们的测量来自一个真正的基于集中式架构的P2P文件共享协议实现:用户向服务器发送查询,该服务器维护当前节点及其共享库的数据库。用户明确同意我们对他们的行为进行匿名记录。由于我们有每个查询的记录,以及查询导致的用户之间的每次传输,我们唯一缺少的信息是用户库中的文件被添加到系统带外的确切时间。这些数据揭示了独立于底层网络文件传输体系结构的用户的下载习惯。我们从Chord项目主页[1]获得了一个Chord模拟器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信