Curative Effect and Complication Rate of Abdominal Myomectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Shuihua Li
{"title":"Curative Effect and Complication Rate of Abdominal Myomectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids","authors":"Shuihua Li","doi":"10.26689/aogr.v1i1.5062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy and complication rate of abdominal myomectomy with those of laparoscopic myomectomy in uterine fibroids. Methods: This study was carried out from January 2021 to January 2023 on 150 patients with uterine fibroids. The patients were divided into two groups, a study group (n = 75) and a control group (n = 75), by digital table grouping. Patients in the control group underwent abdominal myomectomy, whereas patients in the study group underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Surgery-related indicators, incidence of complications, ovarian function indicators, recurrence rate, and pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The surgery-related indicators of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05 ); the incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05); the postoperative ovarian function indicators of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in postoperative recurrence rate and pregnancy rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with uterine fibroids, abdominal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy have similar recurrence and pregnancy rates, but laparoscopic myomectomy can shorten the recovery time and reduce the incidence of complications and the impact on ovarian function. Therefore, the latter should be applied in clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":269611,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/aogr.v1i1.5062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy and complication rate of abdominal myomectomy with those of laparoscopic myomectomy in uterine fibroids. Methods: This study was carried out from January 2021 to January 2023 on 150 patients with uterine fibroids. The patients were divided into two groups, a study group (n = 75) and a control group (n = 75), by digital table grouping. Patients in the control group underwent abdominal myomectomy, whereas patients in the study group underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Surgery-related indicators, incidence of complications, ovarian function indicators, recurrence rate, and pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Results: The surgery-related indicators of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05 ); the incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05); the postoperative ovarian function indicators of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in postoperative recurrence rate and pregnancy rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with uterine fibroids, abdominal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy have similar recurrence and pregnancy rates, but laparoscopic myomectomy can shorten the recovery time and reduce the incidence of complications and the impact on ovarian function. Therefore, the latter should be applied in clinical settings.
腹部子宫肌瘤切除术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效及并发症发生率
目的:比较分析腹部子宫肌瘤切除术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效及并发症发生率。方法:本研究于2021年1月至2023年1月对150例子宫肌瘤患者进行研究。采用数字表分组法将患者分为研究组(n = 75)和对照组(n = 75)。对照组患者行腹部子宫肌瘤切除术,而研究组患者行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术。比较两组手术相关指标、并发症发生率、卵巢功能指标、复发率、妊娠率。结果:研究组手术相关指标低于对照组(P < 0.05);研究组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P < 0.05);研究组术后卵巢功能指标低于对照组(P < 0.05);两组术后复发率、妊娠率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:对于子宫肌瘤患者,腹部子宫肌瘤切除术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的复发率和妊娠率相似,但腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术可缩短恢复时间,减少并发症的发生及对卵巢功能的影响。因此,后者应应用于临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信