Mediation Empowerment in Resolution of Civil Claims in State Court

H. Hariadi
{"title":"Mediation Empowerment in Resolution of Civil Claims in State Court","authors":"H. Hariadi","doi":"10.35335/legal.v12i1.750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediation is a way of resolving disputes through a negotiation process to obtain an agreement between the parties assisted by a mediator as a facilitator, the provisions of which are regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in District Courts. Mediation in court is the institutionalization and empowerment of peace (court-connected mediation) with the philosophical basis of Pancasila which is the basis of the Indonesian State, especially the fourth precept \"Populist led by Wisdom of Wisdom in Deliberation/Representation\". The fourth precept of the Pancasila, among other things, requires that efforts to resolve disputes, conflicts or cases be carried out through deliberations to reach a consensus that is filled with a spirit of kinship. Mediation in court is the result of the development and empowerment of peace institutions as stipulated in the provisions of Article 130 Herziene Inlandsch Reglemen (HIR) / 154 Rechtsreglemen voor de Buitengewesten (RBg) which requires a judge who hears a case to earnestly seek peace between the litigants. Efforts to resolve through Mediation apart from benefiting the parties are also beneficial for the Court because Mediation is expected to overcome the problem of accumulation of cases. however, the results of research at the Sengkang District Court Class IB and the Maros District Court Class IB show that the implementation of mediation is in accordance with Perma No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures at the District Court. However, there are several obstacles encountered in resolving civil lawsuit disputes in the District Court, namely egotism, external factors, educational factors, absence of the parties, passing the time limit, aspects of advocates and aspects of mediator judges.","PeriodicalId":187143,"journal":{"name":"LEGAL BRIEF","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEGAL BRIEF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i1.750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mediation is a way of resolving disputes through a negotiation process to obtain an agreement between the parties assisted by a mediator as a facilitator, the provisions of which are regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in District Courts. Mediation in court is the institutionalization and empowerment of peace (court-connected mediation) with the philosophical basis of Pancasila which is the basis of the Indonesian State, especially the fourth precept "Populist led by Wisdom of Wisdom in Deliberation/Representation". The fourth precept of the Pancasila, among other things, requires that efforts to resolve disputes, conflicts or cases be carried out through deliberations to reach a consensus that is filled with a spirit of kinship. Mediation in court is the result of the development and empowerment of peace institutions as stipulated in the provisions of Article 130 Herziene Inlandsch Reglemen (HIR) / 154 Rechtsreglemen voor de Buitengewesten (RBg) which requires a judge who hears a case to earnestly seek peace between the litigants. Efforts to resolve through Mediation apart from benefiting the parties are also beneficial for the Court because Mediation is expected to overcome the problem of accumulation of cases. however, the results of research at the Sengkang District Court Class IB and the Maros District Court Class IB show that the implementation of mediation is in accordance with Perma No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures at the District Court. However, there are several obstacles encountered in resolving civil lawsuit disputes in the District Court, namely egotism, external factors, educational factors, absence of the parties, passing the time limit, aspects of advocates and aspects of mediator judges.
调解授权在国家法院解决民事索赔
调解是在调解员作为调解人的协助下,通过谈判过程达成双方协议来解决争议的一种方式,其条款在2016年最高法院关于地区法院调解程序的第1号条例中进行了规定。法庭调解是和平的制度化和授权(与法院有关的调解),其哲学基础是潘卡西拉(Pancasila),这是印度尼西亚国家的基础,特别是第四条戒律“民粹主义由审议/代表中的智慧智慧领导”。潘卡西拉会议的第四条戒律除其他外,要求通过审议来努力解决争端、冲突或案件,以达成一种充满亲缘精神的协商一致意见。法庭调解是发展和平机构并赋予其权力的结果,这是第130条和第154条的规定所规定的,该条要求审理案件的法官认真寻求诉讼当事人之间的和平。通过调解解决纠纷的努力,除了对当事人有利外,对法院也有好处,因为调解有望克服案件累积的问题。然而,在圣康地方法院一级法院和马洛斯地方法院一级法院的研究结果表明,调解的实施符合2016年关于地方法院调解程序的第1号法令。然而,区域法院解决民事诉讼纠纷存在着自我本位、外部因素、教育因素、当事人缺位、时效问题、辩护人方面和调解员法官方面的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信