Informal eldercare and care for disabled children in the Nordic countries: prevalence and relation to employment

N. Jakobsson, Andreas Kotsadam, M. Szebehely
{"title":"Informal eldercare and care for disabled children in the Nordic countries: prevalence and relation to employment","authors":"N. Jakobsson, Andreas Kotsadam, M. Szebehely","doi":"10.15845/NJSR.V4I0.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an international comparison, the Nordic countries are generous care spenders and a relatively large proportion of the populations receive formal care services. However, in respect of service provision, the Nordic countries are less similar today than they were some decades ago. Using survey data from three Nordic countries, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, we first document the differences in informal care between the countries, and then we assess its impact on the relationship between informal caregiving and formal employment. We find that informal care is most common in Denmark and least common in Sweden. However, those who provide care in Sweden provide care more often than people in both Norway and Denmark. There is a negative correlation between being a caregiver and the probability of being employed in Norway and Denmark, but not in Sweden. With specific regard to parental care, there is no general relation between the provision of parental care and employment, but those providing substantial care are clearly less likely to work than others. Caring for a disabled child is less common than caring for a parent, but the negative effects on employment are even stronger.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/NJSR.V4I0.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In an international comparison, the Nordic countries are generous care spenders and a relatively large proportion of the populations receive formal care services. However, in respect of service provision, the Nordic countries are less similar today than they were some decades ago. Using survey data from three Nordic countries, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, we first document the differences in informal care between the countries, and then we assess its impact on the relationship between informal caregiving and formal employment. We find that informal care is most common in Denmark and least common in Sweden. However, those who provide care in Sweden provide care more often than people in both Norway and Denmark. There is a negative correlation between being a caregiver and the probability of being employed in Norway and Denmark, but not in Sweden. With specific regard to parental care, there is no general relation between the provision of parental care and employment, but those providing substantial care are clearly less likely to work than others. Caring for a disabled child is less common than caring for a parent, but the negative effects on employment are even stronger.
北欧国家的非正式老年护理和残疾儿童护理:普遍程度及其与就业的关系
在国际比较中,北欧国家是慷慨的护理支出和相对较大比例的人口接受正规护理服务。然而,在提供服务方面,北欧国家今天与几十年前相比没有那么相似。利用来自丹麦、挪威和瑞典三个北欧国家的调查数据,我们首先记录了各国之间非正式护理的差异,然后我们评估了其对非正式护理与正式就业之间关系的影响。我们发现,非正式护理在丹麦最常见,在瑞典最不常见。然而,在瑞典提供护理的人比在挪威和丹麦提供护理的人更多。在挪威和丹麦,照顾者的身份与被雇佣的可能性呈负相关,但在瑞典则不然。具体到父母照顾,提供父母照顾和就业之间没有一般的关系,但那些提供实质性照顾的人显然比其他人更不可能工作。照顾残疾儿童不如照顾父母常见,但对就业的负面影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信