Scaffolding in Learning Cycle 5E, is it Effective or Not?

V. Setyaningrum, Rody Putra Sartika
{"title":"Scaffolding in Learning Cycle 5E, is it Effective or Not?","authors":"V. Setyaningrum, Rody Putra Sartika","doi":"10.21043/thabiea.v3i2.7684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning chemistry in the chemistry education study program has not maximized the scaffolding provision yet, so students still have difficulty in mastering the precondition concept. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of learning using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by scaffolding on acid and base material as seen from an increase in students' understanding of concepts. This research is a quasi-experiment with one group pretest-posttest design. The subjects of this study were 32 students who choose randomly from the chemical education study program class of 2019. The instrument used is an essay learning achievement test to measure students' understanding of acid and base concepts. The results showed that the n-gain value obtained is 0.31 or can be interpreted as an increase with moderate criteria. Therefore it can be concluded that the addition of scaffolding in the 5E learning cycle is effective to increase students' understanding on acid and base material.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i2.7684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning chemistry in the chemistry education study program has not maximized the scaffolding provision yet, so students still have difficulty in mastering the precondition concept. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of learning using the 5E learning cycle model assisted by scaffolding on acid and base material as seen from an increase in students' understanding of concepts. This research is a quasi-experiment with one group pretest-posttest design. The subjects of this study were 32 students who choose randomly from the chemical education study program class of 2019. The instrument used is an essay learning achievement test to measure students' understanding of acid and base concepts. The results showed that the n-gain value obtained is 0.31 or can be interpreted as an increase with moderate criteria. Therefore it can be concluded that the addition of scaffolding in the 5E learning cycle is effective to increase students' understanding on acid and base material.
学习周期5E中的脚手架,是否有效?
化学教育学习计划中的化学学习还没有最大限度地发挥脚手架的作用,学生对前提概念的掌握还存在一定的困难。本研究旨在从学生对概念理解的增加来看,利用酸碱材料搭建辅助的5E学习周期模型来确定学习的有效性。本研究为准实验,采用一组前测后测设计。本研究的对象是32名从2019年化学教育学习课程班级中随机选择的学生。使用的工具是一个论文学习成绩测试来衡量学生对酸和碱概念的理解。结果表明,获得的n-增益值为0.31,或者可以解释为中等标准的增加。因此可以得出结论,在5E学习周期中增加脚手架对提高学生对酸碱物质的理解是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信