Graph-Based Temporal Process Planning and Scheduling for Well Drilling Operations

Maksimilian Pavlov, N. Bukhanov, S. Safonov
{"title":"Graph-Based Temporal Process Planning and Scheduling for Well Drilling Operations","authors":"Maksimilian Pavlov, N. Bukhanov, S. Safonov","doi":"10.2118/213623-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Well construction is the most expensive stage of oil field development. Oil and gas companies carefully calculate all possible expenditures to assure that the project of well construction and exploitation will be profitable in time. The time for every operation of well construction is strictly regulated. However, in different oil and gas companies time allotted, for example, cementing surface casing or tripping operations can differ significantly. Therefore, some oil and gas companies are unable to calculate their well construction expenses accurately and lose a significant amount of money, which can be reduced. Also, engineering teams spend a substantial amount of time developing a drilling plan for the drilling crew, which may also be fully or partially developed by automated means. We present a data-driven approach for automatic planning and scheduling of drilling operations on wells with similar design and geological characteristics, suggesting also an improved operation classification based on the IADC dictionary of drilling operations.\n The model for drilling operations planning is based on the directed graph traversal and process mining techniques. The algorithm takes as an input an undetailed plan, the section which is planned to be drilled, and the phase of well construction (drilling, cementing, logging). The algorithm selects the shortest path between two adjacent operations, gathers all paths together, and outputs a detailed plan with the corresponding time for each operation. For directed graph construction, we processed about 15 drilling reports from wells of a particular oil field which have similar well design and geology conditions by virtue of their geological proximity.\n Algorithm performance was estimated by comparing graph time against similar plan time which was calculated based on the median time of every operation in a whole dataset. Median time (P50 percentile) was used because it demonstrates objective time in terms of well construction operations. We conjecture the above based on the fact that in some cases time for tripping can be faster or slower in some wells due to geological or other conditions, and the median provides an outlier-robust estimate of the average value. Also, graph time was compared between the engineering team's proposed plan and the actual time from drilling reports. Graph construction quality was estimated using three principal metrics: the Jaccard coefficient, structural distance, and fitness similarity.","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213623-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well construction is the most expensive stage of oil field development. Oil and gas companies carefully calculate all possible expenditures to assure that the project of well construction and exploitation will be profitable in time. The time for every operation of well construction is strictly regulated. However, in different oil and gas companies time allotted, for example, cementing surface casing or tripping operations can differ significantly. Therefore, some oil and gas companies are unable to calculate their well construction expenses accurately and lose a significant amount of money, which can be reduced. Also, engineering teams spend a substantial amount of time developing a drilling plan for the drilling crew, which may also be fully or partially developed by automated means. We present a data-driven approach for automatic planning and scheduling of drilling operations on wells with similar design and geological characteristics, suggesting also an improved operation classification based on the IADC dictionary of drilling operations. The model for drilling operations planning is based on the directed graph traversal and process mining techniques. The algorithm takes as an input an undetailed plan, the section which is planned to be drilled, and the phase of well construction (drilling, cementing, logging). The algorithm selects the shortest path between two adjacent operations, gathers all paths together, and outputs a detailed plan with the corresponding time for each operation. For directed graph construction, we processed about 15 drilling reports from wells of a particular oil field which have similar well design and geology conditions by virtue of their geological proximity. Algorithm performance was estimated by comparing graph time against similar plan time which was calculated based on the median time of every operation in a whole dataset. Median time (P50 percentile) was used because it demonstrates objective time in terms of well construction operations. We conjecture the above based on the fact that in some cases time for tripping can be faster or slower in some wells due to geological or other conditions, and the median provides an outlier-robust estimate of the average value. Also, graph time was compared between the engineering team's proposed plan and the actual time from drilling reports. Graph construction quality was estimated using three principal metrics: the Jaccard coefficient, structural distance, and fitness similarity.
基于图的钻井作业时间过程规划与调度
油井建设是油田开发中最昂贵的阶段。石油和天然气公司仔细计算所有可能的支出,以确保建井和开采项目能够及时盈利。每一次建井作业的时间都有严格的规定。然而,在不同的石油和天然气公司,例如,固井地面套管或起下钻作业的时间分配可能会有很大差异。因此,一些油气公司无法准确计算出自己的建井费用,造成了大量的损失,而这些损失是可以减少的。此外,工程团队需要花费大量时间为钻井队制定钻井计划,这些计划也可以全部或部分通过自动化手段制定。我们提出了一种数据驱动的方法,用于对具有相似设计和地质特征的井进行钻井作业的自动规划和调度,并提出了一种基于IADC钻井作业字典的改进作业分类。钻井作业规划模型是基于有向图遍历和过程挖掘技术。该算法以一份不详细的计划作为输入,其中包括计划钻井的区段和建井阶段(钻井、固井、测井)。该算法选择两个相邻操作之间的最短路径,将所有路径聚集在一起,并输出每个操作对应时间的详细计划。对于有向图的构建,我们处理了某油田15口井的钻井报告,这些井的设计和地质条件相似,因为它们的地质位置接近。通过比较图时间和相似计划时间来估计算法性能,相似计划时间是根据整个数据集中每个操作的中位数时间计算的。使用中位数时间(P50百分位数)是因为它反映了建井作业的客观时间。在某些情况下,由于地质或其他条件,某些井的起下钻时间可能会变快或变慢,而中位数提供了平均值的异常值。此外,还将工程团队提出的计划与钻井报告中的实际时间进行了对比。使用三个主要度量来估计图的构建质量:Jaccard系数、结构距离和适应度相似度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信