Using free-listing technique to develop measures of group consensus: the case of language choice in Ukraine

Oleksandr Kuchynskyi
{"title":"Using free-listing technique to develop measures of group consensus: the case of language choice in Ukraine","authors":"Oleksandr Kuchynskyi","doi":"10.18523/2617-9067.2022.5.26-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free-listing is a useful qualitative technique suitable for exploring how groups of individuals think about a cultural domain and define its focal features. This tool is also well-adapted for identifying shared collective priorities which makes free-listing a helpful tool for ethnographers and students of culture who are often lacking this important information at the beginning of the project or have no fast way of acquiring it by other ethnographic means. One of its advantages includes its ability to elicit emic categories in the data at the early stages of fieldwork, thus securing the data quality in addition to its richness. The present study (N = 1253) conducted in January 2021 is part of a larger project merging cultural characteristics and electoral behavior. The data fragment presented in the paper showcases the utility of a free-listing technique for studying consensual beliefs relevant to language-based cultural identity in a sample of Ukrainian- and Russian-speaking Ukrainians. The study this data was collected for explores whether the territorial cleavage in electoral behavior and language divide as a part of it (Russian vs. Ukrainian) in Ukraine signal consistent differences in underlying shared collective beliefs about success and prestige. The preliminary analysis of free-listed items and emerging categories suggests that there are no substantial differences between the language-based groups regarding the beliefs about success and prestige that lie outside the territorial cleavage whereas substantial differences were identified within cleavage-related categories.","PeriodicalId":351555,"journal":{"name":"NaUKMA Research Papers. Sociology","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NaUKMA Research Papers. Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-9067.2022.5.26-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free-listing is a useful qualitative technique suitable for exploring how groups of individuals think about a cultural domain and define its focal features. This tool is also well-adapted for identifying shared collective priorities which makes free-listing a helpful tool for ethnographers and students of culture who are often lacking this important information at the beginning of the project or have no fast way of acquiring it by other ethnographic means. One of its advantages includes its ability to elicit emic categories in the data at the early stages of fieldwork, thus securing the data quality in addition to its richness. The present study (N = 1253) conducted in January 2021 is part of a larger project merging cultural characteristics and electoral behavior. The data fragment presented in the paper showcases the utility of a free-listing technique for studying consensual beliefs relevant to language-based cultural identity in a sample of Ukrainian- and Russian-speaking Ukrainians. The study this data was collected for explores whether the territorial cleavage in electoral behavior and language divide as a part of it (Russian vs. Ukrainian) in Ukraine signal consistent differences in underlying shared collective beliefs about success and prestige. The preliminary analysis of free-listed items and emerging categories suggests that there are no substantial differences between the language-based groups regarding the beliefs about success and prestige that lie outside the territorial cleavage whereas substantial differences were identified within cleavage-related categories.
使用自由清单技术来发展群体共识的措施:乌克兰的语言选择案例
自由列表是一种有用的定性技术,适用于探索群体个人如何思考文化领域并定义其焦点特征。这个工具也很好地适应于确定共同的集体优先事项,这使得免费列表对民族志学者和文化学生来说是一个有用的工具,他们在项目开始时往往缺乏这一重要信息,或者无法通过其他民族志方法快速获得这些信息。它的优点之一是能够在实地工作的早期阶段引出数据的主题类别,从而确保数据的质量和丰富性。目前的研究(N = 1253)于2021年1月进行,是一个融合文化特征和选举行为的更大项目的一部分。论文中的数据片段展示了自由列表技术在乌克兰语和俄语乌克兰人样本中研究与基于语言的文化认同相关的共识信念的效用。收集这些数据的研究旨在探讨乌克兰选举行为中的领土分裂和作为其一部分的语言分歧(俄罗斯vs.乌克兰)是否表明在潜在的共同集体信念中对成功和声望的一致差异。对自由列表项目和新类别的初步分析表明,基于语言的群体之间在关于领域乳沟之外的成功和声望的信念方面没有实质性差异,而在与乳沟相关的类别中发现了实质性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信