Hamlet as Historian

Rhodri Lewis
{"title":"Hamlet as Historian","authors":"Rhodri Lewis","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvw1d7c0.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter evaluates Hamlet's memory and accomplishments as a historian. It begins with the “rights of memory” that Fortinbras asserts as he seizes power at the end of the play, and suggests that they reveal the expedience with which William Shakespeare's Danes relate to their past(s). The chapter then considers the vulnerability of memory, and the concomitant ease with which people forget. It also looks at how Hamlet might have seen his father in his “mind's eye,” and draws on the traditions of moral philosophy and Aristotelian psychology to explain how, throughout Hamlet, Shakespeare distinguishes memory (and imagination) from “discourse of reason.” Finally, the chapter turns to the most famous mnemonic lines in English literature: Hamlet's response to his father's ghost in his second soliloquy. Much of the dramatic charge carried by these lines depends on the Aristotelian distinction between remembering and recollecting, and on the ambiguous metaphors on which early modern mnemonic discourse depends. Both enable Hamlet to pursue a fantasy of mnemonic erasure in which his father's commandment lives “all alone” within the “book and volume” of his brain.","PeriodicalId":412159,"journal":{"name":"Hamlet and the Vision of Darkness","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hamlet and the Vision of Darkness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d7c0.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter evaluates Hamlet's memory and accomplishments as a historian. It begins with the “rights of memory” that Fortinbras asserts as he seizes power at the end of the play, and suggests that they reveal the expedience with which William Shakespeare's Danes relate to their past(s). The chapter then considers the vulnerability of memory, and the concomitant ease with which people forget. It also looks at how Hamlet might have seen his father in his “mind's eye,” and draws on the traditions of moral philosophy and Aristotelian psychology to explain how, throughout Hamlet, Shakespeare distinguishes memory (and imagination) from “discourse of reason.” Finally, the chapter turns to the most famous mnemonic lines in English literature: Hamlet's response to his father's ghost in his second soliloquy. Much of the dramatic charge carried by these lines depends on the Aristotelian distinction between remembering and recollecting, and on the ambiguous metaphors on which early modern mnemonic discourse depends. Both enable Hamlet to pursue a fantasy of mnemonic erasure in which his father's commandment lives “all alone” within the “book and volume” of his brain.
作为历史学家的哈姆雷特
本章评价哈姆雷特作为历史学家的记忆和成就。它从福廷布拉斯在戏剧结尾夺取权力时所主张的“记忆权”开始,并暗示它们揭示了威廉·莎士比亚笔下的丹麦人与他们的过去联系在一起的权宜之计。这一章接着讨论了记忆的脆弱性,以及与之相伴的人们遗忘的容易程度。它还着眼于哈姆雷特如何在他的“心灵之眼”中看到他的父亲,并利用道德哲学和亚里士多德心理学的传统来解释,在整个哈姆雷特中,莎士比亚是如何区分记忆(和想象)与“理性话语”的。最后,本章转向英国文学中最著名的助记台词:哈姆雷特在第二次独白中对父亲鬼魂的回应。这些诗句所承载的戏剧性,很大程度上取决于亚里士多德对记忆和回忆的区分,以及早期现代助记话语所依赖的模棱两可的隐喻。这两者都使哈姆雷特能够追求一种记忆抹除的幻想,在这种幻想中,他父亲的诫命“孤独地”存在于他大脑的“书和卷”中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信