Defining Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Literature Review

Patrick Saint-Louis, Marcklyvens C. Morency, J. Lapalme
{"title":"Defining Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Patrick Saint-Louis, Marcklyvens C. Morency, J. Lapalme","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2017.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been an increasing interest among researchers and practitioners concerning Enterprise Architecture (EA). Despite this increase, several studies have reported a lack of common understanding in EA. Some specific expressions like lack of common terminology, lack of shared meaning and fragmented literature have been frequently used to describe this lack. However, very few systematic studies have been conducted to gain a better understanding about the nature and the extend of these definition differences. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review considering journal articles that contain explicit definitions of EA. 145 definitions were identified and analyzed in order to determine their similarities and differences. The analysis was guided by concepts from the field of terminology. The findings of this study show that there are significant divergences of multiple kind between definitions. The next steps for the EA community would be to achieve something comparable to MacGregor's Theory X and Theory Y model or Mintzberg's schools of thought.","PeriodicalId":315067,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2017.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest among researchers and practitioners concerning Enterprise Architecture (EA). Despite this increase, several studies have reported a lack of common understanding in EA. Some specific expressions like lack of common terminology, lack of shared meaning and fragmented literature have been frequently used to describe this lack. However, very few systematic studies have been conducted to gain a better understanding about the nature and the extend of these definition differences. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review considering journal articles that contain explicit definitions of EA. 145 definitions were identified and analyzed in order to determine their similarities and differences. The analysis was guided by concepts from the field of terminology. The findings of this study show that there are significant divergences of multiple kind between definitions. The next steps for the EA community would be to achieve something comparable to MacGregor's Theory X and Theory Y model or Mintzberg's schools of thought.
定义企业架构:系统的文献回顾
近年来,研究人员和实践者对企业架构(EA)越来越感兴趣。尽管这种情况有所增加,但仍有一些研究报告称,人们对EA缺乏共识。一些特定的表达,如缺乏共同术语、缺乏共同意义和碎片化的文献,经常被用来描述这种缺乏。然而,很少有系统的研究来更好地了解这些定义差异的性质和范围。本研究对包含EA明确定义的期刊文章进行了系统文献综述。我们对145个定义进行了识别和分析,以确定它们的异同。分析以术语领域的概念为指导。本研究的结果表明,不同定义之间存在着明显的多种差异。EA社区的下一个步骤是实现与MacGregor的X理论和Y理论模型或Mintzberg的思想流派相媲美的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信