Re-making state-civil society relationships during the COVID 19 pandemic? An English perspective

C. Dayson, C. Damm
{"title":"Re-making state-civil society relationships during the COVID 19 pandemic? An English perspective","authors":"C. Dayson, C. Damm","doi":"10.3351/ppp.2020.5796569834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State and civil society have had a complicated and inter-twined relationship for many years and this has arguably never been more evident than during the COVID 19 pandemic. This review article discusses how this relationship played out locally and nationally during the early months of the pandemic from an English perspective to consider whether we have witnessed an extension of pre-existing roles or a re-making of new ones. At a national level we identify the exacerbation of pre-existing adversarial relatio nships focussed on the scale and necessity of the government’s financial support package for civil society organisations (CSOs). At the local level we observe an extension of prior complementary relationships, with CSOs further embedded in local systems of decision making, co-ordination and service provision. We also identify a newly visible and increasingly complementary local role for previously supplementary community-led CSOs responding to the needs of vulnerable citizens. It is unclear if the next phase of the pandemic will affect these relationships yet further, or whether these configurations will be preserved following the COVID-19 crisis, but it seems certain that the crisis will have a lasting effect on national and local state-civil society interactions in one way or another.","PeriodicalId":162475,"journal":{"name":"People, Place and Policy Online","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People, Place and Policy Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.2020.5796569834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

State and civil society have had a complicated and inter-twined relationship for many years and this has arguably never been more evident than during the COVID 19 pandemic. This review article discusses how this relationship played out locally and nationally during the early months of the pandemic from an English perspective to consider whether we have witnessed an extension of pre-existing roles or a re-making of new ones. At a national level we identify the exacerbation of pre-existing adversarial relatio nships focussed on the scale and necessity of the government’s financial support package for civil society organisations (CSOs). At the local level we observe an extension of prior complementary relationships, with CSOs further embedded in local systems of decision making, co-ordination and service provision. We also identify a newly visible and increasingly complementary local role for previously supplementary community-led CSOs responding to the needs of vulnerable citizens. It is unclear if the next phase of the pandemic will affect these relationships yet further, or whether these configurations will be preserved following the COVID-19 crisis, but it seems certain that the crisis will have a lasting effect on national and local state-civil society interactions in one way or another.
在COVID - 19大流行期间重建国家-民间社会关系?英语视角
多年来,国家和民间社会之间存在着复杂而错综复杂的关系,可以说,这一点在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间表现得最为明显。这篇综述文章从英国的角度讨论了在大流行的最初几个月里,这种关系是如何在地方和全国范围内发挥作用的,以考虑我们是否目睹了已有角色的延伸或新角色的重新塑造。在国家层面上,我们发现政府对公民社会组织(cso)财政支持计划的规模和必要性加剧了先前存在的敌对关系。在地方层面,我们观察到先前互补关系的延伸,民间社会组织进一步融入地方决策、协调和服务提供系统。我们还确定了一种新的可见的和日益互补的地方作用,即以前补充性的社区领导的民间社会组织响应弱势公民的需求。目前尚不清楚下一阶段的大流行是否会进一步影响这些关系,或者这些配置是否会在COVID-19危机后得到保留,但似乎可以肯定的是,这场危机将以这样或那样的方式对国家和地方政府与民间社会的互动产生持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信