(Un)sustainable consumption: a contested, compelling and critical field

M. Sahakian, S. Wahlen, Daniel Welch
{"title":"(Un)sustainable consumption: a contested, compelling and critical field","authors":"M. Sahakian, S. Wahlen, Daniel Welch","doi":"10.1332/byhl7310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are very pleased to be presenting the second issue of Consumption and Society on (un)sustainable consumption. The thematic focus of this issue recognises the ways in which consumption is both a threat and an opportunity for addressing the societal challenges of the 21st century (Welch et al, 2022). If Warde (2022), in our inaugural issue, argues for a more encompassing approach to consumption studies, the prefix ‘sustainable’ adds yet another layer of complexity. Sustainable consumption can be problematised in different ways. For instance, there are ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ interpretations of sustainable consumption governance (Fuchs and Lorek, 2005), which relate to whether sustainability is understood in terms of efficiency gains, through microand consumer actions at the individual level, or shifting fundamental levels and patterns of consumption through more systemic changes. Oftentimes, the focus is either on environmental concerns on the one hand, or on human wellbeing and justice on the other. For the journal, we see sustainable consumption as an object of study, teaching and research action, which relates broadly to what it means to live ‘a good life’, for all, on a finite planet. We hope to integrate perspectives that take seriously what the idea of sustainability is about, while recognising that ‘sustainable consumption’ is normative, perhaps even utopian, and as such is also ripe for critique. We welcome more critical approaches, specifically through voices that might be currently underrepresented in academic journals, such as those of scholars from the so-called global south. We begin this editorial by outlining how ‘sustainable consumption’ emerged as a field and then present some of the many promising ways forward. The consumption turn in sustainability studies occurred at a time when scholarly Editorial","PeriodicalId":443072,"journal":{"name":"Consumption and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/byhl7310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are very pleased to be presenting the second issue of Consumption and Society on (un)sustainable consumption. The thematic focus of this issue recognises the ways in which consumption is both a threat and an opportunity for addressing the societal challenges of the 21st century (Welch et al, 2022). If Warde (2022), in our inaugural issue, argues for a more encompassing approach to consumption studies, the prefix ‘sustainable’ adds yet another layer of complexity. Sustainable consumption can be problematised in different ways. For instance, there are ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ interpretations of sustainable consumption governance (Fuchs and Lorek, 2005), which relate to whether sustainability is understood in terms of efficiency gains, through microand consumer actions at the individual level, or shifting fundamental levels and patterns of consumption through more systemic changes. Oftentimes, the focus is either on environmental concerns on the one hand, or on human wellbeing and justice on the other. For the journal, we see sustainable consumption as an object of study, teaching and research action, which relates broadly to what it means to live ‘a good life’, for all, on a finite planet. We hope to integrate perspectives that take seriously what the idea of sustainability is about, while recognising that ‘sustainable consumption’ is normative, perhaps even utopian, and as such is also ripe for critique. We welcome more critical approaches, specifically through voices that might be currently underrepresented in academic journals, such as those of scholars from the so-called global south. We begin this editorial by outlining how ‘sustainable consumption’ emerged as a field and then present some of the many promising ways forward. The consumption turn in sustainability studies occurred at a time when scholarly Editorial
(非)可持续消费:一个有争议的、引人注目的和关键的领域
我们很高兴为大家介绍《消费与社会》关于(非)可持续消费的第二期。这个问题的主题焦点认识到,消费既是应对21世纪社会挑战的威胁,也是机遇(Welch etal, 2022)。如果Warde(2022)在我们的创刊号中主张对消费研究采取更全面的方法,那么前缀“可持续”又增加了一层复杂性。可持续消费可以通过不同的方式提出问题。例如,对可持续消费治理有“强”和“弱”的解释(Fuchs和Lorek, 2005),这涉及到可持续性是否被理解为效率收益,通过个人层面的微观和消费者行为,或通过更系统的变化改变消费的基本水平和模式。通常,关注的焦点要么是环境问题,要么是人类福祉和正义。在期刊中,我们将可持续消费视为学习、教学和研究行动的对象,这与在有限的地球上所有人过上“美好生活”的意义广泛相关。我们希望整合认真对待可持续性概念的观点,同时认识到“可持续消费”是规范的,甚至可能是乌托邦式的,因此也成熟了批评。我们欢迎更多的批评方法,特别是通过目前在学术期刊上可能代表性不足的声音,例如来自所谓的全球南方学者的声音。我们在这篇社论的开头概述了“可持续消费”是如何成为一个领域的,然后提出了许多有希望的发展方向。可持续发展研究中的消费转向发生在学术社论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信