Examining Online and In-Person Educator Preparation Program Learning Outcomes

T. Heafner
{"title":"Examining Online and In-Person Educator Preparation Program Learning Outcomes","authors":"T. Heafner","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-9538-1.ch001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of technology to support learning and the value of technology-mediated instruction are critical factors in determining the quality of educator preparation programs. A widely utilized, national measure of teacher readiness and preparation in the USA, edTPA, reports program completers' knowledge and skills in content-specific instructional planning and learner asset differentiation; pedagogical delivery and student engagement; and measures of learning and evaluative feedback to support individual student educational growth. This study leverages these performance scores to measure the equivalency of online teacher candidates' learning outcomes as compared to candidates completing traditional in-person [face-to-face (F2F)] programs. Results suggest candidates who completed the online pathway to teacher licensure were more classroom-ready. Findings challenge notions that traditional methods of teacher preparation are more effective pathways to becoming a teacher and suggest attributes of online learning may be linked to differences in candidate knowledge and skill preparation when equitable curricular opportunities are provided. In light of the global pandemic, the outcomes of this study offer support for the rising need for educators to adapt to the new reality of teaching and learning through technology.","PeriodicalId":264130,"journal":{"name":"Impact of Digital Transformation in Teacher Training Models","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impact of Digital Transformation in Teacher Training Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9538-1.ch001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of technology to support learning and the value of technology-mediated instruction are critical factors in determining the quality of educator preparation programs. A widely utilized, national measure of teacher readiness and preparation in the USA, edTPA, reports program completers' knowledge and skills in content-specific instructional planning and learner asset differentiation; pedagogical delivery and student engagement; and measures of learning and evaluative feedback to support individual student educational growth. This study leverages these performance scores to measure the equivalency of online teacher candidates' learning outcomes as compared to candidates completing traditional in-person [face-to-face (F2F)] programs. Results suggest candidates who completed the online pathway to teacher licensure were more classroom-ready. Findings challenge notions that traditional methods of teacher preparation are more effective pathways to becoming a teacher and suggest attributes of online learning may be linked to differences in candidate knowledge and skill preparation when equitable curricular opportunities are provided. In light of the global pandemic, the outcomes of this study offer support for the rising need for educators to adapt to the new reality of teaching and learning through technology.
检查在线和面对面的教育工作者准备计划的学习成果
技术支持学习的有效性和技术介导教学的价值是决定教育者准备计划质量的关键因素。edTPA是美国广泛使用的教师准备和准备的全国性衡量标准,它报告了课程完成者在具体内容教学计划和学习者资产区分方面的知识和技能;教学交付和学生参与;学习和评估反馈的措施,以支持个别学生的教育成长。本研究利用这些表现分数来衡量在线教师候选人与完成传统面对面(F2F)课程的候选人的学习成果的等效性。结果表明,完成在线教师资格考试的考生在课堂上的表现更好。研究结果挑战了传统的教师培训方法是成为教师的更有效途径的观念,并表明当提供公平的课程机会时,在线学习的属性可能与候选人知识和技能准备的差异有关。鉴于全球大流行,这项研究的结果为教育工作者日益需要适应通过技术进行教学的新现实提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信