Relationship between information sources, and resilience, with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online investigation
Ali Montazeri, A. Tavoli, F. Maftoon, Mansoureh Farhangnia, Fatemeh Naghizadehmoghari, Melika Nourani, Negar Tashakkori, Hoorie Hoorie Hassanpour
{"title":"Relationship between information sources, and resilience, with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online investigation","authors":"Ali Montazeri, A. Tavoli, F. Maftoon, Mansoureh Farhangnia, Fatemeh Naghizadehmoghari, Melika Nourani, Negar Tashakkori, Hoorie Hoorie Hassanpour","doi":"10.52547/payesh.21.5.513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Over-exposure to misinformation or various information resources about covid-19 might cause mental health problems. The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between information sources and resilience on the severity of general anxiety in people living in Tehran during the covid-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran in 1400. Samples were adults over 18 years old. The data was collected via Interment. The link of electronic questionnaires was shared through social media such as WhatsApp, Telegram and Instagram. We asked the participant to answer the questionnaires through the link provided. We collected data on demographic information, and sources of the information. In addition, the General Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Questionnaires were administered. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data using the SPSS software version 23. Results: In all 400 adults were participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 32.17± 12.42 years. The findings showed that, 23.8% of the respondent used social media for information about Covid-19, and 21.0% used news agencies or web sites. The mean GAD score was 6.16±3.76 indicating that 139 participants (34.8%) had minimum anxiety, 199 (49.8%) had mild anxiety, 48 (12%) had moderate anxiety and 14 (3.5%) had severe anxiety. Also, the mean BRS score was 3.14±0.63 indicating that 138 (34.5%) had low resilience, 248 (62.0%) had normal resilience, and 14 (3.5%) had high resilience. Logistic regression analysis showed that a significant association exists between decreased anxiety and higher resilience (P < 0.0001), and increased anxiety with more social media use (P = 0.005). Conclusion: The source of information and resilience affected anxiety during the covid-19 pandemic. People who spent more time on social media during the corona epidemic experienced higher anxiety. The findings also confirmed that more resilience is effective in reducing the severity of anxiety. © 2022, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":235399,"journal":{"name":"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/payesh.21.5.513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Over-exposure to misinformation or various information resources about covid-19 might cause mental health problems. The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between information sources and resilience on the severity of general anxiety in people living in Tehran during the covid-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran in 1400. Samples were adults over 18 years old. The data was collected via Interment. The link of electronic questionnaires was shared through social media such as WhatsApp, Telegram and Instagram. We asked the participant to answer the questionnaires through the link provided. We collected data on demographic information, and sources of the information. In addition, the General Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Questionnaires were administered. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data using the SPSS software version 23. Results: In all 400 adults were participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 32.17± 12.42 years. The findings showed that, 23.8% of the respondent used social media for information about Covid-19, and 21.0% used news agencies or web sites. The mean GAD score was 6.16±3.76 indicating that 139 participants (34.8%) had minimum anxiety, 199 (49.8%) had mild anxiety, 48 (12%) had moderate anxiety and 14 (3.5%) had severe anxiety. Also, the mean BRS score was 3.14±0.63 indicating that 138 (34.5%) had low resilience, 248 (62.0%) had normal resilience, and 14 (3.5%) had high resilience. Logistic regression analysis showed that a significant association exists between decreased anxiety and higher resilience (P < 0.0001), and increased anxiety with more social media use (P = 0.005). Conclusion: The source of information and resilience affected anxiety during the covid-19 pandemic. People who spent more time on social media during the corona epidemic experienced higher anxiety. The findings also confirmed that more resilience is effective in reducing the severity of anxiety. © 2022, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. All rights reserved.
COVID-19大流行期间信息来源、复原力与焦虑之间的关系:一项在线调查
目的:过度接触有关covid-19的错误信息或各种信息资源可能会导致心理健康问题。本研究旨在调查2019冠状病毒病大流行期间生活在德黑兰的人们普遍焦虑严重程度的信息来源与复原力之间的关系。方法:1400年在德黑兰进行横断面研究。样本是18岁以上的成年人。数据是通过Interment收集的。电子问卷的链接通过WhatsApp、Telegram和Instagram等社交媒体分享。我们要求参与者通过提供的链接回答问卷。我们收集了有关人口统计信息和信息来源的数据。此外,还进行了一般焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和简短弹性量表(BRS)问卷调查。采用SPSS软件23版进行描述性分析和logistic回归分析。结果:所有400名成年人参与了这项研究。参与者平均年龄32.17±12.42岁。调查结果显示,23.8%的受访者使用社交媒体获取有关新冠肺炎的信息,21.0%的受访者使用新闻机构或网站。GAD平均得分为6.16±3.76,其中139人(34.8%)有轻度焦虑,199人(49.8%)有轻度焦虑,48人(12%)有中度焦虑,14人(3.5%)有重度焦虑。BRS平均得分为3.14±0.63,其中低弹性138人(34.5%),正常弹性248人(62.0%),高弹性14人(3.5%)。Logistic回归分析显示,焦虑水平的降低与心理弹性的提高存在显著相关性(P < 0.0001),焦虑水平的增加与社交媒体使用的增加存在显著相关性(P = 0.005)。结论:covid-19大流行期间,信息来源和应变能力影响焦虑。在冠状病毒流行期间花更多时间在社交媒体上的人经历了更高的焦虑。研究结果还证实,更强的适应力对减轻焦虑的严重程度是有效的。©2022,伊朗卫生科学研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。