Improving the Accessibility of Federal Graduate Research Awards in Canada

S. Baskaran, Dhanyasri Maddiboina, Jin-Eun Kum, R. Reuben, Kaitlin Kharas, Esmeralda Bukuroshi, Isabella Lim, B. Narayanan
{"title":"Improving the Accessibility of Federal Graduate Research Awards in Canada","authors":"S. Baskaran, Dhanyasri Maddiboina, Jin-Eun Kum, R. Reuben, Kaitlin Kharas, Esmeralda Bukuroshi, Isabella Lim, B. Narayanan","doi":"10.38126/jspg180405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian federal graduate research awards provide graduate students with support that impacts both their experience during their degree and their future career progression. Obtaining federal funding during graduate education qualifies students for additional awards, provides financial security, and increases their research independence. However, the number and value of awards have remained unchanged for almost two decades and the evaluation and eligibility criteria are not designed to encourage applications from students from historically underrepresented groups (URGs). The three federal research funding agencies (the Tri-Agency) have recently released an Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Action Plan to better support early-career individuals from these groups, with a commitment to “identify and address barriers to equitable participation of members from underrepresented groups” (Initiative 1.2.2) and increase participation of URGs in the post-secondary research system (Objective 2). In this memo, we propose three changes to broaden the eligibility and evaluation of federal student awards, as well as increase and standardize the award values. Ultimately, these recommendations will reduce the barriers faced by URGs in applying for and obtaining these awards in a manner not currently addressed by the Tri-Agency’s EDI plan.","PeriodicalId":227854,"journal":{"name":"Intersectional Science Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersectional Science Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian federal graduate research awards provide graduate students with support that impacts both their experience during their degree and their future career progression. Obtaining federal funding during graduate education qualifies students for additional awards, provides financial security, and increases their research independence. However, the number and value of awards have remained unchanged for almost two decades and the evaluation and eligibility criteria are not designed to encourage applications from students from historically underrepresented groups (URGs). The three federal research funding agencies (the Tri-Agency) have recently released an Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Action Plan to better support early-career individuals from these groups, with a commitment to “identify and address barriers to equitable participation of members from underrepresented groups” (Initiative 1.2.2) and increase participation of URGs in the post-secondary research system (Objective 2). In this memo, we propose three changes to broaden the eligibility and evaluation of federal student awards, as well as increase and standardize the award values. Ultimately, these recommendations will reduce the barriers faced by URGs in applying for and obtaining these awards in a manner not currently addressed by the Tri-Agency’s EDI plan.
提高加拿大联邦研究生研究奖的可及性
加拿大联邦研究生研究奖为研究生提供支持,影响他们在学位期间的经历和未来的职业发展。在研究生教育期间获得联邦资助使学生有资格获得额外的奖励,提供经济保障,并提高他们的研究独立性。然而,近二十年来,奖学金的数量和金额一直保持不变,评估和资格标准的设计并不是为了鼓励来自历史上代表性不足的群体(urg)的学生申请。三个联邦研究资助机构(三机构)最近发布了一个公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)行动计划,以更好地支持这些群体的早期职业个人,承诺“识别和解决来自代表性不足群体的成员公平参与的障碍”(倡议1.2.2),并增加urg在高等教育研究系统中的参与(目标2)。我们提出三项改革,以扩大联邦学生奖学金的资格和评估,并增加和标准化奖学金的价值。最终,这些建议将减少urg在申请和获得这些奖励时面临的障碍,而目前三局EDI计划并未解决这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信