Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sesame Production under Improved and Traditional/ Farmer’s Practice/ in Kafta-humera, Tigray Region, Ethiopia

Yemane Hailu Gebre, Tewoderos Meleaku Kahsay
{"title":"Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sesame Production under Improved and Traditional/ Farmer’s Practice/ in Kafta-humera, Tigray Region, Ethiopia","authors":"Yemane Hailu Gebre, Tewoderos Meleaku Kahsay","doi":"10.9734/sajsse/2023/v19i4686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the cost-benefit of sesame production per hectare under improved and (traditional sesame production) farmer's practice. The primary data were collected from the sesame farmers who cultivate both improved and traditional sesame production (plot with improved sesame agronomic technologies on one side and farmers practice on the other side) were selected randomly from the participants of households on the cluster-based large scale demonstration of sesame production during 2019 in kafta-humera district, Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. The study found that farmers were able to generate an average gross income of Ethiopian Birr (ETB) 28997 per hectare (ha) from the improved sesame production, whereas, ETB 19215.21 per ha from their practice, respectively. The average cost of cultivation for improved sesame production was ETB 11857.89 ha and ETB 9259.63 per ha under (traditional sesame production) farmers practice. Therefore, the net profit of sesame production under improved and traditional sesame production was ETB 17139.69 and ETB 9955.58 respectively. This implied that farmers could earn an additional net income of 7184.11 per ha by practicing the recommended sesame technologies. This shows that although the net profit under the improved production system was higher than traditional/farmers practice, higher costs of production were also recorded in improved sesame production than traditional /farmers practice as farmers spend a lot of money on sesame cultivation especially weeding and harvesting. Hence, the government and private sectors should give more emphasis to introduce mechanized row planter, captivators, and combined harvester machines to reduce labor costs especially when the cost of labor is high. Moreover, the price of sesame seed was lower than the previous three-four years. Hence, agricultural economists should consider setting up a sesame price policy to help farmers to gain more profit from selling sesame.","PeriodicalId":162253,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2023/v19i4686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the cost-benefit of sesame production per hectare under improved and (traditional sesame production) farmer's practice. The primary data were collected from the sesame farmers who cultivate both improved and traditional sesame production (plot with improved sesame agronomic technologies on one side and farmers practice on the other side) were selected randomly from the participants of households on the cluster-based large scale demonstration of sesame production during 2019 in kafta-humera district, Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. The study found that farmers were able to generate an average gross income of Ethiopian Birr (ETB) 28997 per hectare (ha) from the improved sesame production, whereas, ETB 19215.21 per ha from their practice, respectively. The average cost of cultivation for improved sesame production was ETB 11857.89 ha and ETB 9259.63 per ha under (traditional sesame production) farmers practice. Therefore, the net profit of sesame production under improved and traditional sesame production was ETB 17139.69 and ETB 9955.58 respectively. This implied that farmers could earn an additional net income of 7184.11 per ha by practicing the recommended sesame technologies. This shows that although the net profit under the improved production system was higher than traditional/farmers practice, higher costs of production were also recorded in improved sesame production than traditional /farmers practice as farmers spend a lot of money on sesame cultivation especially weeding and harvesting. Hence, the government and private sectors should give more emphasis to introduce mechanized row planter, captivators, and combined harvester machines to reduce labor costs especially when the cost of labor is high. Moreover, the price of sesame seed was lower than the previous three-four years. Hence, agricultural economists should consider setting up a sesame price policy to help farmers to gain more profit from selling sesame.
埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区Kafta-humera改良和传统/农民做法/芝麻生产的成本效益分析
本研究旨在探讨改良和传统芝麻生产方式下每公顷芝麻产量的成本效益。主要数据收集自2019年埃塞俄比亚提格雷西部kafta-humera地区基于集群的大规模芝麻生产示范家庭参与者中随机抽取的种植改良和传统芝麻生产的芝麻农民(一边是采用改良芝麻农艺技术的小区,另一边是农民实践)。研究发现,农民能够从改良的芝麻生产中获得每公顷28997埃塞尔巴比尔(ETB)的平均总收入,而从他们的实践中分别获得每公顷19215.21埃塞尔巴比尔的平均总收入。改良芝麻生产的平均种植成本为11857.89欧元/公顷,传统芝麻生产方式下的平均种植成本为9259.63欧元/公顷。因此改良芝麻和传统芝麻生产的净利润分别为17139.69和9955.58。这意味着农民通过实践推荐的芝麻技术可以获得每公顷7184.11美元的额外净收入。这表明,虽然改良生产制度下的净利润高于传统/农民做法,但改良芝麻生产的生产成本也高于传统/农民做法,因为农民在芝麻种植上花费了大量资金,特别是除草和收获。因此,政府和私营部门应更加重视引进机械化行播种机、诱捕机和联合收割机,以降低劳动力成本,特别是在劳动力成本较高的情况下。此外,芝麻的价格低于前三四年。因此,农业经济学家应该考虑制定芝麻价格政策,帮助农民从出售芝麻中获得更多的利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信