Logo? No Logo? The WTO Dispute on Plain Packaging of Tobacco, and Beyond

Enrico Bonadio, Althaf Marsoof
{"title":"Logo? No Logo? The WTO Dispute on Plain Packaging of Tobacco, and Beyond","authors":"Enrico Bonadio, Althaf Marsoof","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3822594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012, Australia became the world’s first nation to introduce plain packaging for tobacco products.This public health measure has been challenged in a number of fora, including at the WTO. <br><br>This chapter focuses on the intellectual property issues of the WTO dispute, and specifically deals with the following three aspects. First, the chapter considers the WTO Panel’s findings relating to the important issue of scientific evidence, which determines the effectiveness of plain packaging measures. <br><br>Secondly, it sets out the Panel’s legal analysis with particular focus on the compatibility of plain packaging with the Agreement on the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the Paris Convention, including the role of TRIPS Article 8 and the 2001 Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, in interpreting TRIPS provisions. Reference is also made to decisions of other domestic courts (indeed, after Australia, very similar tobacco packaging measures have also been adopted by countries such as UK, France and Ireland) and investment arbitral proceedings that have concerned tobacco packaging regulation. <br><br>Thirdly, the chapter focuses on the possible spill-over effects the WTO Panel decision is likely to have on other industries, for instance alcohol and fast food – with such industries already beginning to feel the effect of packaging restrictions in a number of countries.","PeriodicalId":264671,"journal":{"name":"Nanyang Business School Research Paper Series","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanyang Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3822594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2012, Australia became the world’s first nation to introduce plain packaging for tobacco products.This public health measure has been challenged in a number of fora, including at the WTO.

This chapter focuses on the intellectual property issues of the WTO dispute, and specifically deals with the following three aspects. First, the chapter considers the WTO Panel’s findings relating to the important issue of scientific evidence, which determines the effectiveness of plain packaging measures.

Secondly, it sets out the Panel’s legal analysis with particular focus on the compatibility of plain packaging with the Agreement on the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the Paris Convention, including the role of TRIPS Article 8 and the 2001 Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, in interpreting TRIPS provisions. Reference is also made to decisions of other domestic courts (indeed, after Australia, very similar tobacco packaging measures have also been adopted by countries such as UK, France and Ireland) and investment arbitral proceedings that have concerned tobacco packaging regulation.

Thirdly, the chapter focuses on the possible spill-over effects the WTO Panel decision is likely to have on other industries, for instance alcohol and fast food – with such industries already beginning to feel the effect of packaging restrictions in a number of countries.
标志吗?没有标志?WTO关于烟草平装及其他问题的争端
2012年,澳大利亚成为世界上第一个对烟草产品实行平装包装的国家。这一公共卫生措施在包括世贸组织在内的一些论坛上受到质疑。本章主要研究WTO争端中的知识产权问题,具体从以下三个方面进行论述。首先,本章考虑了WTO专家组关于科学证据这一重要问题的调查结果,科学证据决定了平装措施的有效性。第二,它阐述了专家组的法律分析,特别侧重于普通包装与《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》)和《巴黎公约》的兼容性,包括《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》第8条和2001年《与贸易有关的知识产权与公共卫生多哈宣言》在解释与贸易有关的知识产权条款方面的作用。还参考了其他国内法院的判决(事实上,在澳大利亚之后,英国、法国和爱尔兰等国家也采取了非常类似的烟草包装措施)和涉及烟草包装监管的投资仲裁程序。第三,本章的重点是世贸组织专家组的决定可能对其他行业产生的溢出效应,例如酒精和快餐,这些行业已经开始感受到一些国家包装限制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信