I’ll be grotesque before your eyes: The expanding monstrousness between Is This Scary? (1993) and Michael Jackson’s Ghosts (1996)

Sam R. M. Geden
{"title":"I’ll be grotesque before your eyes: The expanding monstrousness between Is This Scary? (1993) and Michael Jackson’s Ghosts (1996)","authors":"Sam R. M. Geden","doi":"10.1386/jafp_00088_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of the monster in the film Michael Jackson’s Ghosts (Stan ) by comparing it to its original unreleased version Is This Scary? (Mick ). Despite on the surface telling very similar stories about an angry mob storming the mansion of the reclusive and eccentric Maestro, its use of monsters and monstrousness changes drastically due to the contexts in which both films were made, namely before and after allegations of child molestation were made against Jackson. Comparing these two films offers a uniquely comprehensive insight into how Jackson perceived himself within society, as well as how and why cultural backlash against him manifested. The article includes a comparative analysis of both films’ characters, themes and shared sequences, supplanted by analysis of Jackson’s life and fluctuating critical reality within these two eras. Ultimately, the article will demonstrate an expansion of Jackson’s understanding of his own media freakishness: acknowledging the societal perceptions that made the allegations against him so believable and using it to advocate for his humanity.","PeriodicalId":126238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jafp_00088_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the role of the monster in the film Michael Jackson’s Ghosts (Stan ) by comparing it to its original unreleased version Is This Scary? (Mick ). Despite on the surface telling very similar stories about an angry mob storming the mansion of the reclusive and eccentric Maestro, its use of monsters and monstrousness changes drastically due to the contexts in which both films were made, namely before and after allegations of child molestation were made against Jackson. Comparing these two films offers a uniquely comprehensive insight into how Jackson perceived himself within society, as well as how and why cultural backlash against him manifested. The article includes a comparative analysis of both films’ characters, themes and shared sequences, supplanted by analysis of Jackson’s life and fluctuating critical reality within these two eras. Ultimately, the article will demonstrate an expansion of Jackson’s understanding of his own media freakishness: acknowledging the societal perceptions that made the allegations against him so believable and using it to advocate for his humanity.
我将在你眼前变得怪诞:这可怕吗?(1993)和迈克尔·杰克逊的《幽灵》(1996)
这篇文章研究了电影《迈克尔·杰克逊的幽灵》(斯坦)中怪物的角色,并将其与未发行的原始版本进行了比较。(米克)。尽管表面上讲的是非常相似的故事,一群愤怒的暴徒袭击了这位隐居而古怪的大师的豪宅,但由于两部电影的拍摄背景,即在杰克逊被指控猥亵儿童之前和之后,它对怪物和怪物的使用发生了巨大的变化。通过比较这两部电影,我们可以全面地了解杰克逊是如何看待自己在社会中的地位,以及文化上对他的抵制是如何以及为什么表现出来的。这篇文章包括对两部电影的人物、主题和共同序列的比较分析,取而代之的是对杰克逊的生活和这两个时代波动的批评现实的分析。最终,这篇文章将展示杰克逊对他自己的媒体怪癖的理解的扩展:承认社会观念使对他的指控如此可信,并利用它来倡导他的人性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信