Utilizing Grammarly in an Academic Writing Process: Higher-Education Students’ Perceived Views

Faisal Faisal, Primita Arif Carabella
{"title":"Utilizing Grammarly in an Academic Writing Process: Higher-Education Students’ Perceived Views","authors":"Faisal Faisal, Primita Arif Carabella","doi":"10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This small-scale study looks into the English-Language-Education-Program (ELE) students’ perceived views on using Grammarly as an automatic grammar checker in an academic writing process. It adopted a questionnaire instrument Novianti (2020) employed in her study. The interval scale average of 73.3% indicated that most students positively perceived using Grammarly in the academic writing process. They deemed that this application could help them revise their errors in the academic writing process, improve their academic writing, and boost their confidence in academic writing. On the other hand, some students negatively perceived using Grammarly in their academic writing process due to the nature of feedback this application offers. Furthermore, this study considered that factors that might have affected both views were associated with Grammarly’s handy and practical use and non-contextual and irrelevant feedback. This study is a small-scale one, primarily investigating students’ perceptions of the use of Grammarly application in an academic writing process. Future research can expand such dimensions as students’ attitudes in using this application or the impacts of Grammarly on students’ writing anxiety. Moreover, it can investigate students’ perceptions of the use of the application in an academic writing process by employing different instruments and indicators of perception.","PeriodicalId":223469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This small-scale study looks into the English-Language-Education-Program (ELE) students’ perceived views on using Grammarly as an automatic grammar checker in an academic writing process. It adopted a questionnaire instrument Novianti (2020) employed in her study. The interval scale average of 73.3% indicated that most students positively perceived using Grammarly in the academic writing process. They deemed that this application could help them revise their errors in the academic writing process, improve their academic writing, and boost their confidence in academic writing. On the other hand, some students negatively perceived using Grammarly in their academic writing process due to the nature of feedback this application offers. Furthermore, this study considered that factors that might have affected both views were associated with Grammarly’s handy and practical use and non-contextual and irrelevant feedback. This study is a small-scale one, primarily investigating students’ perceptions of the use of Grammarly application in an academic writing process. Future research can expand such dimensions as students’ attitudes in using this application or the impacts of Grammarly on students’ writing anxiety. Moreover, it can investigate students’ perceptions of the use of the application in an academic writing process by employing different instruments and indicators of perception.
在学术写作过程中运用语法:高等教育学生的感知观点
这项小规模的研究着眼于英语语言教育项目(ELE)学生在学术写作过程中使用Grammarly作为自动语法检查器的感知观点。它采用了Novianti(2020)在她的研究中使用的问卷调查工具。间隔量表平均为73.3%,表明大多数学生积极地感知在学术写作过程中使用语法。他们认为这个应用程序可以帮助他们修改学术写作过程中的错误,提高他们的学术写作水平,增强他们的学术写作信心。另一方面,由于该应用程序提供的反馈性质,一些学生对在学术写作过程中使用Grammarly持负面看法。此外,本研究认为可能影响两种观点的因素与Grammarly的方便和实际使用以及非上下文和不相关的反馈有关。本研究是一项小规模的研究,主要调查学生在学术写作过程中使用语法应用的看法。未来的研究可以拓展学生使用该应用程序的态度或Grammarly对学生写作焦虑的影响等维度。此外,它可以通过使用不同的工具和感知指标来调查学生在学术写作过程中使用应用程序的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信