From the Trap of Urban Community to the Plurality:

Kosuke Hishiyama
{"title":"From the Trap of Urban Community to the Plurality:","authors":"Kosuke Hishiyama","doi":"10.5637/jpasurban.2018.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper clarifies a limitation of modern paradigm in the urban sociology of Japan and proposes a new perspective based on the field research in Bali, Indonesia. This paper adopts a concept ‘pluralistic collectivity’ [C. Geertz] as a core of the philosophy of the social structure in Bali and deal with four case studies, local security, gated community, traditional small green space, and mobilities of Japanese lifestyle migrants. The local security systems are established based on pluralistic collectivity by local people. They contribute to making new local images or multicultural activities of local security. The case of the gated communities and traditional small green space are evaluated as the ‘border spaces’ with the plurality. Japanese lifestyle migrants exist between immigration and tourism. Besides, from the viewpoints of residential mobility and daily mobility, This paper clarifies their ways of using the gated communities, which increase the possibility of their mobilities. Through the re-evaluation of the four case studies from the perspective of Michihiro Okuda’s urban studies, the importance of constituting society from the ‘border spaces’ and of the continuous ‘reflection’ or ‘elaboration’ is proposed.","PeriodicalId":101506,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of Japan Association for Urban Sociology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of Japan Association for Urban Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5637/jpasurban.2018.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper clarifies a limitation of modern paradigm in the urban sociology of Japan and proposes a new perspective based on the field research in Bali, Indonesia. This paper adopts a concept ‘pluralistic collectivity’ [C. Geertz] as a core of the philosophy of the social structure in Bali and deal with four case studies, local security, gated community, traditional small green space, and mobilities of Japanese lifestyle migrants. The local security systems are established based on pluralistic collectivity by local people. They contribute to making new local images or multicultural activities of local security. The case of the gated communities and traditional small green space are evaluated as the ‘border spaces’ with the plurality. Japanese lifestyle migrants exist between immigration and tourism. Besides, from the viewpoints of residential mobility and daily mobility, This paper clarifies their ways of using the gated communities, which increase the possibility of their mobilities. Through the re-evaluation of the four case studies from the perspective of Michihiro Okuda’s urban studies, the importance of constituting society from the ‘border spaces’ and of the continuous ‘reflection’ or ‘elaboration’ is proposed.
从城市社区的陷阱到多元化
本文在阐述日本城市社会学现代范式的局限性的基础上,以印尼巴厘岛的实地考察为基础,提出了一个新的视角。本文采用了“多元集体”的概念[C]。作为巴厘岛社会结构哲学的核心,并处理了四个案例研究,即当地安全,封闭式社区,传统的小型绿色空间和日本生活方式移民的流动性。地方治安制度是建立在地方人民多元集体的基础上的。它们有助于形成新的地方形象或地方安全的多元文化活动。封闭社区和传统小型绿地的案例被评价为具有多元性的“边界空间”。日本的生活方式移民介于移民和旅游之间。此外,从居住流动性和日常流动性的角度,明确了他们使用封闭式社区的方式,增加了他们流动的可能性。通过从奥田道弘城市研究的角度对这四个案例的重新评价,提出了从“边界空间”构建社会以及持续“反思”或“阐述”的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信