Emerging Technological Innovations in the Legal Profession and Its Impact on the Regulation of Market Competition: Kenyan Perspective

Vellah Kedogo Kigwiru
{"title":"Emerging Technological Innovations in the Legal Profession and Its Impact on the Regulation of Market Competition: Kenyan Perspective","authors":"Vellah Kedogo Kigwiru","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3355861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative technologies trigger changes that threaten current markets, social as well as political orders; and the once conservative and exclusive legal market is no longer immune. The increasingly informed tech-savvy client base, the unbundling of legal services, online service delivery, and the application of new technologies in the legal profession such as big data, artificial intelligence, blockchain and automation of legal services continues to disrupt the legal profession in profound ways. For a long time, the legal profession has enjoyed exclusivity in the provision of legal services through state and self-regulation. The entrance of legal technological innovations bring with them competition that is affecting the way the legal market operates. In response and in a bid to maintain the market share and revenues, lawyers have continued to resist the impact of technological innovations. For instance, in 2018 the Kenyan government sought to digitize the land registry. The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) in suing the Ministry of Land against automation of land registry argued that lawyers were the only ones mandated to execute conveyancing process in accordance with Section 34 of the Advocates Act. Further, as a regulatory body, there were no regulations in place on how e-conveyancing was to be conducted. This reaction by the LSK brings fourth key legal regulatory issues that this paper seeks to discuss: the current legal technological innovations in the legal sector, the opportunities and the challenges they present; regulatory concerns such as regulation of unlicensed legal services providers, price regulation and professional competence. Second, the interaction of legal services innovation with professional regulations, the implications of the current legal profession on market competition and the role of competition authorities in enforcing competition in the legal market. Finally, it will review the legal and competition regulatory framework in the wake of emerging disruptive technologies in a bid to provide reforms.","PeriodicalId":120850,"journal":{"name":"African Law eJournal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative technologies trigger changes that threaten current markets, social as well as political orders; and the once conservative and exclusive legal market is no longer immune. The increasingly informed tech-savvy client base, the unbundling of legal services, online service delivery, and the application of new technologies in the legal profession such as big data, artificial intelligence, blockchain and automation of legal services continues to disrupt the legal profession in profound ways. For a long time, the legal profession has enjoyed exclusivity in the provision of legal services through state and self-regulation. The entrance of legal technological innovations bring with them competition that is affecting the way the legal market operates. In response and in a bid to maintain the market share and revenues, lawyers have continued to resist the impact of technological innovations. For instance, in 2018 the Kenyan government sought to digitize the land registry. The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) in suing the Ministry of Land against automation of land registry argued that lawyers were the only ones mandated to execute conveyancing process in accordance with Section 34 of the Advocates Act. Further, as a regulatory body, there were no regulations in place on how e-conveyancing was to be conducted. This reaction by the LSK brings fourth key legal regulatory issues that this paper seeks to discuss: the current legal technological innovations in the legal sector, the opportunities and the challenges they present; regulatory concerns such as regulation of unlicensed legal services providers, price regulation and professional competence. Second, the interaction of legal services innovation with professional regulations, the implications of the current legal profession on market competition and the role of competition authorities in enforcing competition in the legal market. Finally, it will review the legal and competition regulatory framework in the wake of emerging disruptive technologies in a bid to provide reforms.
法律行业的新兴技术创新及其对市场竞争监管的影响:肯尼亚视角
创新技术引发的变化威胁到当前的市场、社会和政治秩序;曾经保守而排外的法律市场也不再幸免。日益见多识广、精通技术的客户群、法律服务的分拆、在线服务交付以及大数据、人工智能、区块链和法律服务自动化等新技术在法律行业的应用,继续以深刻的方式颠覆法律行业。长期以来,法律行业享有通过国家和自律提供法律服务的排他性。法律技术创新的进入带来了竞争,影响着法律市场的运作方式。作为回应,为了保持市场份额和收入,律师们继续抵制技术创新的影响。例如,2018年,肯尼亚政府试图将土地登记数字化。肯尼亚律师协会(LSK)在起诉土地部反对土地登记自动化时辩称,根据《倡导者法》第34条,律师是唯一被授权执行转让过程的人。此外,作为一个规管机构,并没有就如何进行电子转易订立规例。LSK的这种反应带来了本文试图讨论的第四个关键法律监管问题:法律部门当前的法律技术创新,它们带来的机遇和挑战;规管方面的关注,例如规管无牌法律服务供应商、价格规管及专业能力。第二,法律服务创新与专业法规的相互作用,当前法律行业对市场竞争的影响,以及竞争管理机构在法律市场中执行竞争的作用。最后,它将在新兴的颠覆性技术之后审查法律和竞争监管框架,以提供改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信