Particular features of a semiotic approach in transmedia franchises study

V. V. Furs
{"title":"Particular features of a semiotic approach in transmedia franchises study","authors":"V. V. Furs","doi":"10.52512/2306-5079-2023-93-1-60-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the revealing of semiotic approach specificity in the study of media franchises as the results of transmedia storytelling. The transmedia franchises’ research needs a certain revision of some semiotic notions. In particular, the present article deals with the study of iconic signs’ functioning in the media franchises. The classic definition of iconic sign proposed by Ch. S. Peirce and based on some similarity of icon and its object, seems to contradict to the fictional text characteristics as “denotation without denotate” made by G. Gennette, which means that signs of a fiction work don’t have referents in the extratextual reality. In the article the attempt was made to eliminate this collision, using the understanding of the iconic sign by Umberto Eco, on the one hand, and the principle of “minimal departure” by M.-L. Ryan, on the other. The article concludes that the products of fiction are often nothing more than a result of combination of existing objects or of their parts that creates the illusion of a realism of the fictional world’ characters and locations and retains the credibility of the audience members. The article also deals with the specificity of the notion “semiosis” in the transmedia franchises study. In the case of a fictional world that is constantly expanding and detailing thanks to transmedia storytelling, we are dealing with a specific, transmedia semiosis, in which each new work of the franchise is a kind of interpretant for the other texts included in it.","PeriodicalId":162040,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52512/2306-5079-2023-93-1-60-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the revealing of semiotic approach specificity in the study of media franchises as the results of transmedia storytelling. The transmedia franchises’ research needs a certain revision of some semiotic notions. In particular, the present article deals with the study of iconic signs’ functioning in the media franchises. The classic definition of iconic sign proposed by Ch. S. Peirce and based on some similarity of icon and its object, seems to contradict to the fictional text characteristics as “denotation without denotate” made by G. Gennette, which means that signs of a fiction work don’t have referents in the extratextual reality. In the article the attempt was made to eliminate this collision, using the understanding of the iconic sign by Umberto Eco, on the one hand, and the principle of “minimal departure” by M.-L. Ryan, on the other. The article concludes that the products of fiction are often nothing more than a result of combination of existing objects or of their parts that creates the illusion of a realism of the fictional world’ characters and locations and retains the credibility of the audience members. The article also deals with the specificity of the notion “semiosis” in the transmedia franchises study. In the case of a fictional world that is constantly expanding and detailing thanks to transmedia storytelling, we are dealing with a specific, transmedia semiosis, in which each new work of the franchise is a kind of interpretant for the other texts included in it.
跨媒体特许经营研究中符号学方法的特点
本文旨在揭示符号学方法在媒体特许经营研究中的特殊性,这是跨媒体叙事的结果。跨媒体特许经营的研究需要对一些符号学概念进行一定的修正。特别地,本文研究了标志性标志在媒体特许经营中的功能。皮尔斯(Ch. S. Peirce)提出的标志性符号的经典定义,基于符号与其客体的某种相似性,似乎与根内特(G. Gennette)的小说文本特征“无所指的外延”(denotation without denotate)相矛盾,即小说作品的符号在文本外的现实中没有指涉物。在这篇文章中,试图消除这种冲突,一方面使用Umberto Eco对标志性标志的理解,另一方面使用M.-L.的“最小偏离”原则。另一边是瑞安。这篇文章的结论是,小说的产品通常只不过是现有物体或它们的部分组合的结果,创造了虚构世界的人物和地点的现实主义幻觉,并保留了观众的可信度。本文还探讨了“符号学”概念在跨媒体特许经营研究中的特殊性。在一个虚构的世界中,由于跨媒体故事叙述而不断扩展和细化,我们处理的是一种特定的跨媒体符号学,在这种情况下,该系列的每一部新作都是对其中包含的其他文本的一种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信